Catalog
English
Catalog
Везде
  
93.185.164.21
Modeling Interregional Migration in Differentiating the Characteristics of One Local Public Service
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
2946


Downloads
468
Educational programs
Управление в социальных и экономических системах,  Математическое моделирование, численные методы и комплексы программ,  Экономика и управление народным хозяйством,  Математические и инструментальные методы экономики,  Философия науки и техники,  Социальная философия
UDC
33 Экономика. Народное хозяйство. Экономические науки
Publisher
State Academic University for the Humanities
Date of publication
30.03.2019
Public year
2019
DOI
10.18254/S207751800005114-4
Modeling Interregional Migration in Differentiating the Characteristics of One Local Public Service
Read
Cite
Annotation

The heterogeneous nature of the preferences of citizens living in different economic zones creates difficulties for the state in meeting the needs of the population in local public services. American economist W. Oates, studying this problem, derived a theorem on decentralization, according to which it is advisable to assign responsibility for the provision of local public services to local governments. With a decentralized approach, local communities independently determine the parameters of their own basket of public services. This condition creates a situation of choice for citizens: each individual can “vote with their feet” for one or another jurisdiction. This is the essence of Tiebout hypothesis, the study of which is the subject of this paper. The article proposes an agent-based model that simulates the process of inter-regional population migration. Agent-based approach is a relatively new area of simulation. Its essence lies in the representation of complex processes as aggregates of agents interacting with each other and with the environment. Each agent has an individual objective function, which he seeks to maximize (minimize) according to established rules. From the set of actions and interactions of agents, the global dynamics of a system is born that is of particular interest for research. The active agents in the proposed model are individuals with unique demand functions for each public service. Regions - passive agents - aggregate the functions of the demand of individuals. Regional equilibria for each public service are formed from the ratio of aggregate demand functions and regional supply functions. Moving between regions, individuals are looking for the best option for the combination of prices and production volumes of services. Migration through a change in the ratios of aggregated demand functions is reflected in the parameters of regional equilibria, which creates a new situation of choice for individuals.  

Artificial societies. 2019 Issue 1
Source
About authors
Ruslan Ramazanov
Ufa federal research center of the Russian academy of sciences
References

1. Bakhtizin A. R. Agent-orientirovannye modeli ehkonomiki. M.: Ehkonomika. 2008. 279 s.

2. Zul'karnaj I.U. Modelirovanie gorizontal'noj konkurentsii yurisdiktsij // Iskusstvennye obschestva. 2014. T. 9. № 1–4. https://artsoc.jes.su/s207751800000033-5-1/

3. Makarov V.L., Bakhtizin A.R., Sushko E.D., Ageeva A.F. Iskusstvennoe obschestvo i real'nye demograficheskie protsessy // Ehkonomika i matematicheskie metody. 2017. T. 53. № 1. S. 3–18.

4. Ramazanov R.R. Gipoteza Tibu: imitatsionnyj analiz // Doklady Bashkirskogo universiteta. T 3. № 6. 2018. S. 680-685.

5. Yakobson L.I., Kolosnitsyna M.G. Ehkonomika obschestvennogo sektora // uchebnik dlya vuzov 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.: Yurajt. 2014. – 558 s.

6. Buchanan J. M. (1986). The Demand and Supply of Public Goods. Rand McNally. Chicago

7. Lindahl E.R. Die Gerechtigkeit der Besteurung: Eine Analyse der Steuerprinzipien auf Grundlage der Grenznutzentheorie. – Lund, 1919.

8. Musgrave R.A. (1938). The voluntary exchange theory of Public Economy // Quarterly Journal of Economics. № 53. P. 2013–237

9. Oates W. E. An Essay on Fiscal Federalism // Journal of Economic Literature. 1999. 37 (3). Pp. 1120-1149.

10. Oates W.E. Fiscal Federalism // Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York. 1972.

11. Pigou A.C. Study in Public Finance. London, 1928.

12. Samuelson R.A. (1954). The pure theory of Public expenditure // Review of Economics and Statistics.

13. Tiebout C. A. Pure Theory of Local Expenditures // The Journal of Political Economy. 1956. Vol.64. No. 5. Pp. 416–424.

14. Tiebout C. An Economic Theory of Fiscal Decentralization // In: NBER, Public Finances, Needs, Sources and Utilization. Princeton (Univ.Press). 1961. Pp.79–96.

15. Weingast B.R. Second Generation Fiscal Federalism: Implications decentralized Democratic Governance and Economic Development // Initiative for Policy Dialogue. 2007. 71 p.

16. Weingast B.R. The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development // Law, Economic and Organization. 1995. Vol.11. No.1. Pp. 3–31.

Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас
На месяц
490 Р / Month
На полугодие
390 Р / Month
2,340 Р за 6 месяцев
На год
290 Р / Month
3,480 Р за год