1. Закон о национальной научно-технической политике, организации и приоритетах 1976 года был усечённой и видоизменённой версией законопроекта о создании ведомства научных исследований гражданского назначения, за который с 1972 года выступал сенатор Эдвард Кеннеди.

2. Concerning Federally Sponsored Inducement Prizes in Engineering and Science. Report of the Steering Committee for the Workshop to Assess the Potential for Promoting Technological Advance through Government-Sponsored Prizes and Contests, National Academy of Engineering, 1999. ISBN: 0-309-57534-6. 56 p.

3. Broad Agency Announcement: DARPA Robotics Challenge. Tactical Technology Office (TTO) DARPA-BAA-12-39 April 10, 2012. URL: http://www.fbo.gov/utils/view?id=74d674ab011d5954c7a46b9c21597f30

4. См. Don Sherman. Semi-Autonomous Cars Compared. Car and Driver, February 2016. URL: http://www.caranddriver.com/features/semi-autonomous-cars-compared-tesla-vs-bmw-mercedes-and-infiniti-feature-autonomous-milestones-page-7, а также:

5. Martyn Williams. Google loses robotics chief to Toyota's $1B research lab. PC World, Jan 5, 2016. URL: http://www.pcworld.com/article/3019498/car-tech/google-loses-robotics-chief-to-toyotas-1b-research-lab.html

6. Dr. Gill Pratt. Biography (Toyota USA) URL: http://corporatenews.pressroom.toyota.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=5423

7. Acs Zoltan J., Audretsch David B. Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis. American Economic Review, Vol. 78, no. 4, 1988. Pp. 678-690. DOI: 10.2307/1811167

8. Acs Zoltan J., Audretsch David B. Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 69, no. 4, 1987. Pp.567-574. DOI: 10.2307/1935950

9. Aghion, Philippe, Nicholas Bloom, Richard Blundell, and Peter Howitt. Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 9269, Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2002. 70 p.

10. Alberts Bruce. Overbuilding Research Capacity. Science, Vol. 329, no. 5997, 2010. sep. Pp. 1257-1257. DOI: 10.1126/science.1197077.

11. Alston Julian, Sexton Richard J., Zhang Mingxia. Imperfect competition, functional forms, and the size and distribution of research benefits. Agricultural Economics, Vol. 21, no. 2, 1999. oct. Pp. 155-172. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5150(99)00022-5

12. Arrow, Kenneth J. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources to Invention. In: R.R. Nelson (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Economic Activity. N.Y., Princeton University Press, 1962.

13. Bozeman, B., and J. Rogers. 2001. Strategic Management of Government-Sponsored R&D Portfolios: Lessons from Office of Basic Energy Sciences Projects. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. URL: https://web.archive.org/web/ 20030309085755/http://rvm.pp.gatech.edu/papers/strtmng05-05.pdf (17 August 2002).

14. Carter C. F. The distribution of scientific effort. Minerva, Vol. 1, no. 2, 1963. Pp. 172-181. DOI: 10.1007/bf01096249

15. Cooper Robert, Edgett Scott, Kleinschmidt Elko. Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study. R&D Management, Vol. 31, no. 4, 2001. Pp. 361-380. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9310.00225

16. Dasgupta, Partha, Eric Maskin. The Simple Economics of Research Portfolios. The Economic Journal, Vol.97, no.387, 1987. Pp. 581–595. DOI: 10.2307/2232925

17. Gansler Jacques S., William Lucyshyn, and Michael Arendt. Competition in Defense Acquisitions. UMD-AM-09-001. Univ. of Maryland, February 2009. 60 p.

18. Gilbert, Richard. Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where are we in the competition-innovation debate? In: A. B. Jaffe, J. Lerner, & S. Stern (Eds.), Innovation policy and the economy (Vol. 6, pp. 159–215). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2006.

19. Hage Jerald, Gretchen Jordan, Jonathon Mote, Yuko Whitestone. Designing and facilitating collaboration in R&D: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 25, no. 4, 2008. Pp. 256-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2008.10.005

20. Harris, Chris, and John Vickers. Perfect Equilibrium in a Model of a Race. Review of Economic Studies, Vol.52, 1985. Pp.193-209. DOI: 10.2307/2297616

21. Hopenhayn H., Squintani F. The Direction of Innovation. Stanford University, March 2016. 52 p.

22. Leibenstein, Harvey. Allocative Efficiency versus X-Efficiency. American Economic Review Vol.56, no.3, 1966. Pp.392–415. DOI: 10.2307/1823775

23. Link Albert N. Firm Size and Efficient Entrepreneurial Activity: A Reformulation of the Schumpeter Hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy, Vol.88, no. 4, 1980. Pp. 771-782. DOI: 10.2307/1837312

24. Link, A. N., and J. Lunn. Concentration and the Returns to R&D. Review of Industrial Organization Vol.1, no.3, 1984. Pp.232–239. DOI: 10.1007/bf02457066

25. Lunn John. An empirical analysis of firm process and product patenting. Applied Economics, Vol. 19, no. 6, 1987. Pp. 743-751. DOI: 10.1080/00036848700000106

26. Mansfield Edwin. Technological Change and Market Structure: An Empirical Study. American Economic Review, Vol. 73, no. 2, 1983. Pp. 205-209. DOI: 10.2307/1816841

27. McGeary M., Smith P. M. The R&D Portfolio: A Concept for Allocating Science and Technology Funds. Science, Vol. 274, no. 5292, 1996.Pp. 1484-1485. DOI: 10.1126/science.274.5292.1484

28. Merton, Robert K. Singletons and Multiples in Scientific Discovery. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 105, no. 5, 1961. Pp. 470-86. DOI: 10.2307/985546

29. Mote Jonathon E., Gretchen Jordan, Jerald Hage, Yuko Whitestone. New directions in the use of network analysis in research and product development evaluation. Research Evaluation, Vol. 16, no. 3, 2007. Pp. 191-203. DOI: 10.3152/095820207x235746

30. Reinganum, Jennifer F. Dynamic Games of Innovation. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol.25, no.1, 1981. Pp. 21-41. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0531(81)90015-6

31. Research and innovation in the modern corporation / Edwin Mansfield, John Rapoport, Jerome Schnee et al. Palgrave Macmillan, 1971. 239 p. ISBN: 9780333140390

32. Scherer F.M. The propensity to patent. International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1, no. 1, 1983. Pp. 107-128. DOI: 10.1016/0167-7187(83)90026-7

33. Schmidt Klaus M. Managerial Incentives and Product Market Competition. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 64, no. 2, 1997. Pp. 191-213. DOI: 10.2307/2971709

34. Schumpeter Joseph A. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Routledge, 2008 [1942]. 437 p. ISBN: 9780585460390

35. Scott, John T. Firm versus Industry Variability in R&D Intensity. In: Griliches, Zvi (Ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984. Pp.233-40.

36. Sutton, John. 1998. Technology and Market Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 676 p.

37. Teece David J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, Vol. 15, no. 6, 1986. Pp. 285-305. DOI: 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2

38. The Science of Science Policy: A Federal Research Roadmap. Report on the Science of Science Policy to the Subcommittee on Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences, Committee on Science, NSTC, OSTP. Wash., D.C., November 2008. 52 p. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/files/documents/ostp/NSTC%20Reports/39924_PDF%20Proof.pdf

39. The Science of Science Policy. Kaye Husbands Fealings, Julia Lane, John H. Marburger III, Stephanie S. Shipp (eds.) 2011. 397 p.

40. Utterback James M., Abernathy William J. A Dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation. Omega, Vol. 3 (1975), pp. 639-656. DOI: 10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7

41. Vonortas Nicholas S. Research joint ventures in the US. Research Policy, Vol. 26, no. 4-5, 1997. Pp. 577-595. DOI: 10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00032-2

42. Wu Yonghong. NSFs Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR): Subsidizing academic research or state budgets? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 28, no. 3, 2009. Pp. 479-495. DOI: 10.1002/pam.20442

43. Zeppini P., van den Bergh J. C. J. M. Optimal diversity in investments with recombinant innovation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. Vol. 24, 2013. Pp.141-156.