93.185.164.20
Ethno-Cultural Images at Central Asia: National Costume
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
2656


Downloads
126
UDC
33 Экономика. Народное хозяйство. Экономические науки
93/94 История
32 Политика
Date of publication
11.12.2020
Public year
2020
DOI
10.31857/S086919080012505-2
Ethno-Cultural Images at Central Asia: National Costume
Annotation

Ethno-cultural images (ECI) are not by chance of interest to researchers of various social disciplines: their effectiveness in solving an urgent regional problem which is the search and strengthening of the latest national and state identities in each of the five young independent republics of Central Asia is generally recognized. It is well known that the main resource in the creation of ECI is often historical and cultural heritage of the people, and therefore various ethnographic sources. One of them is a national costume. The article reveals who and for what purpose creates modern national costumes (significantly different from the complexes of traditional “ethnic clothing” of the past), what are their new functions inside and outside the state. Author notes the coexistence of two types of ECI in the modern mass culture of Central Asia. The distribution area of the first type is associated with large historical and cultural areas that developed in ancient times (such as Semirechye, Ferghana, Khorezm, Sogd, Margiana, etc.), and, of course, do not coincide with the borders of modern states. The population of each such historical and cultural area had its own local complexes of traditional clothing, which were the ECIs of these real and spontaneously formed cultural communities. Fragments of such images have partially preserved to the present. The second type of modern Central Asian ECI is represented by the latest “national costumes” that combine the features of modern “European” and generalized local traditional clothing. The creation of it began in Soviet times, but now their transformation has intensified, and the function is much clearer – this type of ECI serves only as a tool for constructing new national and state identities in each republic.

About authors
Luidmila Chvyr
Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
References

1. Abashin S.N. Nationalisms in Central Asia: in the Search of Identity. St. Peterburg: Aletheia, 2007 (in Russian).

2. Arutyunov S.A. Peoples and Cultures. Development and Interaction. Moscow: Nauka, 1989 (in Russian).

3. Arutyunov S.A., Ryzhakova S.I. Cultural Anthropology. Moscow: Ves mir, 2004 (in Russian).

4. Volkov I.V. Main Directions and Prospects of Integration of Central Asia into Global World Processes: Ethno-Confessional Aspect. Bishkek: Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University, 2008 (in Russian).

5. Ilkhamov А. The Archeology of Uzbek Identity. Etnographicheskoe Obozrenie. 2005. No. 1. Pp. 25–47 (in Russian).

6. Kazantsev A. The “Great game” with Unknown Rules. Moscow: Fond “Nasledie Evrazii”, 2008 (in Russian).

7. Kamoliddin Sh.S. Actual Problems of Historiography of the History of Central Asia. Tashkent: Tashkent State Institute of Oriental Studies, 2017 (in Russian).

8. Kandel A.R. In Search of Memory. Moscow: Corpus, Аstrel, 2012 (in Russian).

9. Karmysheva B.H. Essays on the Ethnic History of the Southern Areas in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Moscow: Nauka, 1976 (in Russian).

10. Kosmarsky A.A. The Polite Refusal of Conflicts: an Anthropological Explanation of the “Stability” of Post-Soviet Uzbekistan. Centralnaia Evrasia. 2018. No. 2. Pp.135–148 (in Russian).

11. Larina E.I. National Identity and Traditional Social Institutions in Central Asia. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 8. 2012. No. 4. Pp. 66–90 (in Russian).

12. Masson V.M. The Cultural Genesis of Ancient Central Asian. St. Peterburg: St-Petersburg University Publisher, 2006 (in Russian).

13. Nurulla-Khodzhayeva N. Decolonization of Eurasian Studies (Reflections of Culturologist). Сentralnaia Evrasia. 2018. No. 1. Pp. 224–240 (in Russian).

14. Paramonov V. What Prevents the Unification of Central Asian Countries (forum Discussion on the forum of the “Central Eurasia” Project). www.ceasia.ru/forum/761 (accessed: 15.06.2020) (in Russian).

15. Symonova O.A. The Study of Emotions as an Area of the Interdisciplinary Integration: History and Sociology in Search of an Explanation for “Emotional Turn”. Russian Sociological Review. 2018. Vol. 17. No. 3. Pp. 356–378 (in Russian).

16. Sukhareva O.A. Scullcaps. Folk Decorative Art of Soviet Uzbekistan. Тashkent: Academia Nauk Uzbekskoi respubliki, 1954. Рр. 147–166 (in Russian).

17. Turson A. On the Synergetics of Post-Soviet Social Space-Time: Political Stratification vs Cultural Foliation. Iran-nameh. Journal of Oriental studies. 2012. No. 1(21). Pp. 5–31 (in Russian).

18. Foltz R. What Does the Term “Tajik” Mean? “The Whole World is the Body, Iran is the Heart...”. Collection of Papers on Iranian Studies. Ed. S. Abdullo. Almaty, 2019. Pp. 100–111 (in Russian).

19. Chvyr L.A. One Actual Problem of Ethnography of the Peoples of Central Asia. Problems of Ethnogenesis and Ethnic History of Central Asia and Kazakhstan. Issue 3. Ed. B.A. Litvinsky, T.A. Zhdanko. Мoscow: Nauka, 1991. Pp. 13–24 (in Russian).

20. Chvyr L.A. Cultural Areas and Ethnonyms. Myth. Sofia: Nov Bolgarski universitet, 2001. No. 7. Pp. 309–323 (in Russian).

21. Chvyr L.A. On the Structure of the Tajik Ethic Group. Races and Peoples. Ed. by G. Vasilieva. Moscow: Nauka, 2001. Bd. 27. Рр. 9–21 (in Russian).

22. Chvyr L.A. Essays on Cultural Synthesis in Turkestan (I–II millennium AD). St. Peterburg – Moscow: Nestor-Istoria, 2018 (in Russian).

23. Schoberlein-Engel D. Prospects for National Development of Self-Awareness of the Uzbeks. Vostok (Oriens). 1997. No. 3. Рр. 52–70 (in Russian).

24. Bohr A. The Central Asian States as Nationalising Regims. National-Building in the Post-Soviet Borderlands. The Politics of National Identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

25. Constructing the Uzbek State Narratives of the Post-Soviet Year. Ed. M. Laruelle. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2018.

26. Denison M. The Art of Impossible: Political Symbolism and the Creation of National Identity and Collective Memory in Post-Soviet Turkmenistan. Europe-Asia Studies. Bd. 61, no. 7. Glasgow, Routledge, 2009. Рp. 1167–1187.

27. Gorshenina S. Uzbekistan’s “Cultural Inheritance” in Constructing “Collective Memory” in the Age of Independence. Central Asia at 25: Looking Back, Mooving Forward. A Collection Essays from Central Asia. Eds. M. Laruelle, A. Kourmanova. Washington DC: Central Asia Program, 2017.

28. Laruelle M., Peyrouse S. Regional Organizations in Central Asia: Patterns of Interaction, Dilemmas of Efficiency. Institute of Public Policy and Administration, University of Central Asia, Working Paper. No. 10. Washington DC, 2012.

29. Rakhimov M. Internal and External dynamics of Regional Cooperation in Central Asia. Journal of Eurasian Studies. Vol. 1. Issue 2. Amsterdam–London–Oxford, 2010. Pp. 95–101.

30. Uzbekistan: Political Order, Societal Changes and Cultural Transformations. Ed. M. Laruelle. Washington DC: Central Asia Program, 2017.

Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас