On the problem of the serfs of clerical lords in pre-revolutionary Mongolia

Kuzmin, Sergius

93.185.164.21

Home/Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost. 2018 Issue 1/On the problem of the “serfs of clerical lords” in pre-revolutionary Mongolia

On the problem of the “serfs of clerical lords” in pre-revolutionary Mongolia

Read

Download pdf

Add to favorite

Cite

Reviews

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Views

2301

Downloads

279

Educational programs

Языки народов зарубежных стран Европы, Азии, Африки, Политические проблемы международных отношений, глобального и регионального развития

UDC

33 Экономика. Народное хозяйство. Экономические науки

93/94 История

32 Политика

Publisher

Russian Academy of Sciences

Date of publication

21.11.2018

Public year

2018

DOI

10.7868/S086919081801003X

On the problem of the “serfs of clerical lords” in pre-revolutionary Mongolia

Read

Add to favorite

Cite

Annotation

Comparative analysis of data on the status of serfs in Russia, Europe and the shav' arats in Mongolia before revolution was conducted. Formal and factual status of Mongolian aristocracy, the arat people subjected to them, Buddhist clergy and the shav' is discussed. The clergy in prerevolutionary Mongolia was a separate social group, and it is not correct to consider high lamas as “feudal lords”. The shav' actually were not serfs: there were no feudal lords whom they obeyed, and only in some aspects their status corresponds to the status of serfs. Only whole complex of features but not a part of it may serve as evidence for the presence of serfdom; otherwise, this term would be applied also to those societies where it was actually absent. Responsibilities of the shav', regardless of their social status, were explained based on the “disciple – guru” principle based on the Buddhist Canon and not on the feudal law.

Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost. 2018 Issue 1

Source

https://vostokoriens.jes.su/s0869-19080000038-4-1/

About authors

Sergius Kuzmin

Principal Research Fellow, Institute of Oriental Studies

Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences

References

1. Altanzayaa L. [Novoe o shabinarakh Yalguusan-khutukhty v Sehtsehnkhanskom ajmake] // Nomadic Studies (Ulaanbaatar). 2010. Vol. 17.

2. Altanzayaa L. [K voprosu o shabinarakh khalkhaskogo Nojon-khutukhty IV] // Tүүkhijn sudlal. 2011–2012. T. 41–42. № 12.

3. Al'tamira-i-Krevea R. Istoriya Ispanii. T. 1. M., 1951.

4. Baranov. Mongoliya. Barga i Khalkha. Kharbin, 1905.

5. Baranov. Severo-vostochnye sejmy Mongolii. Kharbin, /b.g./.

6. Blok M. Feodal'noe obschestvo. M., 2003.

7. Velikaya reforma. Russkoe obschestvo i krest'yanskij vopros v proshlom i nastoyaschem. T. 1–3. M.,1911.

8. Vladimirtsov B. Ya. Raboty po istorii i ehtnografii mongol'skikh narodov. M., 2002.

9. Vosemnadtsat' stepnykh zakonov: Pamyatnik mongol'skogo prava XVI–XVII vv. SPb., 2002 (per. A. D. Nasilova) – http://www.vostlit.info/Texts/Dokumenty/Mongol/18_stepnych_zakonov/frametext.htm (data obrascheniya: 21.09.2017).

10. Gorokhova G. S. Ocherki po istorii Mongolii v ehpokhu man'chzhurskogo gospodstva (konets XVII – nachalo KhKh v.). M., 1980.

11. Daurskij V. Dzhassa // Sovremennaya Mongoliya. 1937. № 6 (25).

12. Daurskij V. Shabinary //Sovremennaya Mongoliya. 1939 № 3–4 (34–35).

13. Dashbadrakh D. 2004. Mongolyn khutagtuud (XVI–XX zuun). Ulaanbaatar.

14. Dorzh B. [Rol' buddijskoj religii v mongol'skom feodalizme] // Mongolyn feodalizmyn nijtlehg, ontslogijn zarim asuudal. Ulaanbaatar, 1987.

15. Istoriya MNR. M.: Nauka. Izd. 1: 1954. Izd. 2: 1967. Izd. 3: 1983.

16. Istoriya Mongolii. KhKh vek. M., 2007.

17. Kalantarov. Krepostnoe pravo v Gruzii v nachale nastoyaschego stoletiya. Tiflis, 1877.

18. Kashtanov S. M. Krepostnoe pravo v Rossii // Bol'shaya sovetskaya ehntsiklopediya – http://dic.academic.ru (data obrascheniya: 21.09.2017).

19. Knyaz'kov S. Kak slozhilos' i kak palo krepostnoe pravo. SPb., 1900.

20. Kotvich V. Kratkij obzor istorii i sovremennogo politicheskogo polozheniya Mongolii. SPb., 1914.

21. Krajnova L. V. Shabinskoe vedomstvo lamaistskoj tserkvi Mongolii v period pravleniya Tsinskoj dinastii // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. 2012. № 2 (16), ch. 1. – www.gramota.net/materials/3/2012/2-1/26.html (data obrascheniya: 21.09.2017).

22. Majskij I. M. Sovremennaya Mongoliya. Irkutsk, 1921.

23. Majskij I. M. Mongoliya nakanune revolyutsii. M., 1959.

24. Marks K., Ehngel's F., Lenin V.I. O religii. M., 1983.

25. Mironov B. N. Krepostnoe pravo: ratsional'nyj institut ili besspornoe zlo? // Krepostnoe pravo i ego otmena: istoriya i sovremennost'. SPb., 2005.

26. Myagmarsambuu G. Mongolyn shashin, tөrijn nehrt zүtgehltehn Egүzehr khutagt Zhamsranzhavyn Gal-sandash (1870–1930). Ulaanbaatar, 2014.

27. Natsagdorzh Sh. Ar Mongold garsan ardyn khɵdɵlgɵɵn tүүkhehn najruulal. Ulaanbaatar, 1956.

28. Ninzhbadgar Z. [O nekotorykh izmeneniyakh v upravlenii shabinarami Dzhebtszundamba-khutukhty (XVIII v.)] // Tүүkhijn sudlal. 2011–2012. T. 41–42. № 11.

29. Pavlov-Sil'vanskij N. P. Feodalizm v Rossii. M., 1988.

30. Pozdneev A. M. Urginskie khutukhty. SPb., 1879 (1880).

31. Pozdneev A. Ocherki byta buddijskikh monastyrej i buddijskogo dukhovenstva v Mongolii. SPb., 1887. Reprint: Ehlista. 1993.

32. Pozdneev A. Mongoliya i mongoly. T. 1. SPb., 1896.

33. Przheval'skij N. M. Mongoliya i strana tangutov. T. 1. SPb., 1875.

34. Purehvzhav S. Istoriya lamaistskoj tserkvi v Mongolii v kontse XVI – nachale KhKh v. Dokt. diss. M.: IV RAN. 1983.

35. P?rehvzhav S., Dashzhamts D. BNMAU-d sum, khijd, lam naryn asuudlyg shijdvehrlehsehn n'. 1921–1940 on. Ulaanbaatar, 1965.

36. RGASPI – Rossijskij gosudarstvennyj arkhiv sotsial'no-politicheskoj istorii, Moskva.

37. Sandag Sh. Obrazovanie Mongol'skogo feodal'no-teokraticheskogo gosudarstva i ego vneshnyaya politika (1911–1919 gg.). Kand. diss. M.: MGIMO. 1958.

38. Skrynnikova T. D. Lamaistskaya tserkov' i gosudarstvo. Vneshnyaya Mongoliya XVI – nachalo KhKh v. Novosibirsk, 1988.

39. Smolich I. K. Prilozhenie. Russkoe monashestvo: Vozniknovenie, razvitie, suschnost' (988–1917) // Istoriya Russkoj Tserkvi. M., 1997. http://www.sedmitza.ru/lib/text/436549/ (data obrascheniya:21.09.2017).

40. Khalkha Dzhirum. Pamyatnik mongol'skogo feodal'nogo prava XVIII veka. M., 1965.

41. Tsehdehv D. Polozhenie aratov-shabinarov urginskikh khutukht v dorevolyutsionnoj Mongolii. Avtoref. … kand. diss. M.: IV RAN. 1959.

42. Tsehdehv D. Ikh shav'. Ulaanbaatar, 1964.

43. Chzhe Tsonkapa. Bol'shoe rukovodstvo k ehtapam puti Probuzhdeniya. T. 1. SPb., 2010.

44. Chojbalsan Kh. Kratkij ocherk istorii Mongol'skoj narodnoj revolyutsii. M., 1952.

45. Shirendyb B. Narodnaya revolyutsiya v Mongolii i obrazovanie Mongol'skoj narodnoj respubliki 1921–1924. M., 1956.

46. Shirendyb B. Istoriya Mongol'skoj narodnoj revolyutsii 1921 g. Dokt. diss. M.: IV AN SSSR. 1960.

47. Shirendyb B. Istoriya Mongol'skoj narodnoj revolyutsii 1921 goda. M., 1971.

48. Ehngel'man N. Istoriya krepostnogo prava v Rossii. M., 1900.

49. Ehntsiklopedicheskij slovar' F. A. Brokgauza i I. A. Efrona. SPb., 1890–1907. http://www.vehi.net/brokgauz/ (data obrascheniya: 21.09.2017).

50. Feudalism // Catholic Encyclopedia. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06058c.htm (data obrascheniya: 21.09.2017).

51. Huricha. [Mongol'skie monastyrskie rabotniki pri Tsinskoj dinastii – proizvodstvo i zhizn' shabinarov v mongol'skikh monastyryakh] // Neimenggu shi fan da xue xue bao: she hui ke xueban. 2007. № 4.

52. Ingram J. K. History of Slavery and Serfdom. London, 1895.

53. Moses L. W. The Political Role of Mongolian Buddhism. Indiana Univ. 1977.

54. Ogilvie Sh. Serfdom and the Institutional System in Early Modern Germany // Schiavitu e servaggionell’economia europea. Secc. XI–XVIII: Atti della “Quarantecinquesima settimana di studi”, 14–18 aprile 2013. Firenze: Firenze Univ. Press, 2014 (Atti delle Settimane di Studi e altri Convegni, 45).

55. Oidtmann M. Between patron and priest: Amdo Tibet under Qing rule, 1792–1911. Doctoral dissertation.

56. Harvard University. 2013. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/11745702/Oidtmann_gsas.harvard_0084L_11276.pdf?sequence=1 (data obrascheniya: 21.09.2017).

57. Stanziani A. Bondage, Labor and Rights in Eurasia, 17–20th Centuries. N.Y., 2014.

58. Vreeland H. H. Mongol Community and Kinship Structure. New Haven, 1953.

Similar

The Cultural Traditions of Buddhism in Russia

Boris M.

Полная версия доступна только подписчикам

Подпишитесь прямо сейчас

GOST	Kuzmin S. On the problem of the “serfs of clerical lords” in pre-revolutionary Mongolia // Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost. – 2018. – Issue 1 C. 23-30 . URL: https://vostokoriens.jes.su/s0869-19080000038-4-1/. DOI: 10.7868/S086919081801003X
MLA	Kuzmin, Sergius "On the problem of the “serfs of clerical lords” in pre-revolutionary Mongolia." Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost. 1 (2018).:23-30. DOI: 10.7868/S086919081801003X
APA	Kuzmin S. (2018). On the problem of the “serfs of clerical lords” in pre-revolutionary Mongolia. Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost. no. 1, pp.23-30 DOI: 10.7868/S086919081801003X

Catalog

Subscription

Help

Partnership