93.185.164.20
Diagnostic system for cooperative pricing detection in retail markets
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
1861


Downloads
67
UDC
33 Экономика. Народное хозяйство. Экономические науки
Date of publication
04.09.2020
Public year
2020
DOI
10.31857/S042473880010533-5
Diagnostic system for cooperative pricing detection in retail markets
Annotation

The article is devoted to the research and development of a diagnostic system for detecting signs of cooperative pricing in retail markets. We consider methods and algorithms for successively identifying the presence of market power, as well as signs of abuse of this power. Five components of the diagnostic system are distinguished: dominance, concentration based on market shares, concentration based on market prices, general cooperation and episodic (or seasonal) cooperation. As a basic concept for the detecting of cooperative behavior, we used conjectural variations approach. In our opinion, it uses a relatively small number of a priori assumptions about interactions between market agents, which is important for empirical research. Mathematical models are considered for calculating the level of cooperation, allowing to analyze the degree of use of market power in a static and dynamic aspects. The proposed diagnostic system can be used by government, antitrust and regulatory authorities to monitor the level of competition in retail markets and identify signs of price cooperation. In turn, the same methods can also help market agents to analyze their pricing policy, to prove the fact of fair competitive behavior and to adjust pricing in a timely manner.

About authors
Mikhail Filkin
Senior researcher
CEMI RAS
References

1. Berge W. (1947). Cartels challenge to a free world. Translated from the English. Foreign Languages Publishing House (in Russian).

2. Filkin M.E. (2010). Competition in the retail gasoline market. Economics of Contemporary Russia, 3 (50), 78–92 (in Russian).

3. Filkin M.E. (2017). Method of hidden Markov chains for estimation of the level of competition. Competitiveness in the Global World: Economics, Science, Technology, 8 (part 4), 127–132 (in Russian).

4. Baltensperger T., Fuchslin R., Krutli P., Lygeros J. (2016). Multiplicity of equilibria in conjectural variations models of natural gas markets. European Journal of Operational Research, 252 (2), 646–656.

5. Baum L.E., Petrie T. (1966). Statistical inference for probabilistic functions of finite state Markov chains. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 37 (6), 1554–1563.

6. Chang W., Sugeta H. (2004) Conjectural variations, market power, and optimal trade policy in a vertically related industry. Review of International Economics, 12, 12–26.

7. Diaz C.A., Villar J., Campos A., Reneses J. (2010). Electricity market equilibrium based on conjectural variations. Electric Power Systems Research, 80, 12, December, 1572–1579.

8. Harrington J.E. (2005). Detecting cartels. Working Paper, No. 526. The Johns Hopkins University, Department of Economics, Baltimore, MD. Ch. 1.

9. Julien L.A. (2010). From imperfect to perfect competition: A parametric approach through conjectural variations. The Manchester School, 78, 6, 660–677.

10. Rotemberg J.J., Saloner G. (1986). A supergame-theoretic model of price wars during booms. American Economic Review, 76, 390–407.

11. Slade M.E. (1986). Conjectures, firm characteristics and market structure. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 4, 347–369.

12. Viterbi A.J. (1967). Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 13 (2), 260–269.

13. Yao D., DeSanti S. (1993). Game Theory and the Legal Analysis of Tacit Collusion. Antitrust Bulletin, 38, 1 (Spring), 113–141.

Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас