93.185.164.21
The influence of reference system on construction of world image in psychology and physics
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
252


Downloads
12
UDC
159.9 Психология
Date of publication
14.08.2021
Public year
2021
DOI
10.31857/S020595920016016-3
The influence of reference system on construction of world image in psychology and physics
Annotation

Psychosemantics makes it possible to construct iconic descriptions of mental maps (images of the world) of both individuals and different social groups. Obviously, differences in perception of the world are related to physical, biological psychological, socio-cultural differences of respondents, i.e. to their generalized reference system. We associate individual consciousness with the individual, particular subject or observer (in physics). However, the subject is not part of physical paradigm, unlike psychology, and the attempt to include it directly in quantum theory (J. Wigner, R. Penrose, etc.) requires an adequate correlation of physical and psychological paradigms for its realization. In particular, the extension of the reference system associated with the observer in physics to the reference system of the “subject” in psychosemantics allows a systematic approach to solving this problem.

About authors
Victor Petrenko
1Lomonosov Moscow State University; Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Anatoly Suprun
Lomonosov Moscow State University; Federal Research Center “Informatics and Management” RAS
References

1. Abul'hanova K.A. O sub"ekte psihologicheskoj deyatel'nosti. In: Metodologicheskie problemy psihologii. Ed. V.A. Lektorskij. Moscow: Nauka, 1973. (In Russian)

2. Andreeva G.M. Glava 11: Obshchie problemy maloj gruppy v social'noj psihologii. In: Social'naya psihologiya. 5-e izd. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2008. (In Russian)

3. Bernshtejn N.A. O postroenii dvizhenij. Moscow: Medgiz, 1947. (In Russian)

4. Bom D. Prichinnost' i sluchajnost' v sovremennoj fizike. Per. s angl. S. F. Shushurina. Moscow: IL, 1959. (In Russian)

5. Brushlinskij A.V. Psihologiya sub"ekta. Nauchnoe izdanie. Saint Petersburg: ALETEJYA, 2003. (In Russian)

6. Dennet D. Vidy psihiki: na puti k ponimaniyu soznaniya. Per. s angl. A. Veretennikova; pod obshch. red. L. B. Makeevoj. Moscow: Ideya-Press, 2004. (In Russian)

7. Grinshtejn Dzh., Zajonc A. Kvantovyj vyzov. Sovremennye issledovaniya osnovanij kvantovoj mekhaniki. Dolgoprudnyj: Intellekt, 2008. (In Russian)

8. Kasavin T.I. Tekst. Diskurs. Kontekst. Vvedenie v social'nuyu epistemologiyu yazyka. Moscow: Kanon+, 2008. (In Russian)

9. Leont'ev A.N. Deyatel'nost', Soznanie, Lichnost’. Moscow, 1977. (In Russian)

10. Lindorf D. Yung i Pauli: vstrecha dvuh velikih umov. Moscow: Kastaliya, 2013. (In Russian)

11. Mikeshina L.A. Relyativizm kak epistemologicheskaya problema. Epistemologiya segodnya. Idei, problemy, diskussii. Nizhnij Novgorod: Izd-vo NGU im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, 2018. (In Russian)

12. Nazaretyan A.P. Istina kak kategoriya mifologicheskogo myshleniya. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 1995. № 4. P. 106. (In Russian)

13. Nejman fon Dzh. Matematicheskie osnovy kvantovoj mekhaniki. M, 1932. (In Russian)

14. Penrouz R. Teni razuma: V poiskah nauki o soznanii [Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness]. Moscow–Izhevsk: IKI, 2011. (In Russian)

15. Petrenko V.F. Osnovy psihosemantiki. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2005. (In Russian)

16. Petrenko V.F. Psihosemantika soznaniya. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 1988. (In Russian)

17. Petrenko V.F., Suprun A.P. Metodologicheskie peresecheniya psihosemantiki soznaniya i kvantovoj fiziki. Moscow: KRASAND, 2017. (In Russian)

18. Petrovskij V.A. Psihofizicheskaya problema: “Kto” vidit mir? (Eskiz koncepcii vzaimo oposredovaniya). Metodologiya i istoriya psihologii. 2018. № 1. P. 58–83. (In Russian)

19. Puankare A. Izbrannye trudy: v 3 t. Moscow: Nauka, 1973. T. 3. (In Russian)

20. Rorti R. Filosofiya i zerkalo prirody. Per. s angl.; nauch. red. V.V. Celishchev. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo Novosib. un-ta, 1997. (In Russian)

21. Rossohin A.V. Interpretacii v psihoanalize: Tam, gde bylo YA i Ono, dolzhno stat' Inoe. Zhurnal klinicheskogo i prikladnogo psihoanaliza. 2020. Vol. I. № 1. P. 5–51. (In Russian)

22. Rubinshtejn S.L. Chelovek i Mir. Seriya: Mastera psihologii. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2012. (In Russian)

23. Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. Struktura, istoricheskaya evolyuciya. Moscow: Progress-Tradiciya, 2000. (In Russian)

24. Suprun A.P., Yanova N.G., Nosov K.A. Metapsihologiya. Moscow: URSS, 2019. (In Russian)

25. Talbot M. Golograficheskaya Vselennaya. Moscow: Sofiya, 2004. (In Russian)

26. Shredinger E. Razum i materiya. Izhevsk: NIC “Regulyarnaya i haoticheskaya dinamika”, 2000. (In Russian)

27. Yaroshevskij M.G. Psihologiya v XX v. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury, 1974.

28. Aspect A., Grangier P. & Roger G. Experimental realization of Einstein — Podolsky — Rosen-Bohm Gedanken experiment: A new violation of Bell’s inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982. Vol. 49. P. 91–94,

29. Everett H. “Relative State” Formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics. 1957. Vol. 29. P. 454–462.

30. Suprun S.P., Suprun A.P. Computers: Classical, Quantum and Others. Bentham Science Publisher Sharjah, U.A.E. Saif Zone, 2011.

31. Wigner E. Remarks on the Mind-Body Question. In: John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас