Catalog
English
Catalog
Везде
  
93.185.164.20
Labor Market In The Digital Economy – Prospects For Regulation
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
101


Downloads
0
Educational programs
Мировая экономика,  Политические проблемы международных отношений, глобального и регионального развития
UDC
33 Экономика. Народное хозяйство. Экономические науки
Publisher
Russian Academy of Sciences
Date of publication
23.11.2022
Public year
2022
DOI
10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-10-102-111
Labor Market In The Digital Economy – Prospects For Regulation
Read
Cite
Annotation

The article examines the social problems that arise due to the lack of legal mechanisms for regulating social and labor relations in a digitalizing labor market. The author emphasizes that the main result of the formation of the digital economy was the organizational restructuring of the labor market. The consequence of this is the transformation of traditional enterprises that hire staff on the terms of an employment contract into crowd-working platforms that “serve” an unlimited number of employers and provide them with the “services” of workers for the implementation of certain technological operations. The resulting relations are increasingly fragmented and atomized in comparison with the traditional social and labor relations. The legal form of exercising the employees’ right to work is changing – from hired labor into self-employment. As a result of the ongoing transformations, labor relations are deprived of a social component based on the joint responsibility of employers and employees for the social well-being of the latter. Thus, the main legal and at the same time socioeconomic problem in the context of digitalization of the labor market is the “disappearance” (in the legal sense) of the subject that is responsible for the payment of insurance social contributions of digital (platform) workers. This is one of the main social challenges of the digital economy: it is becoming more difficult to fill social funds in the same volumes, to provide insurance for the employed against major social risks, which ultimately threatens the implementation of the social function of the state. The author emphasizes that the deterioration of the social situation is by no means due to the legal or technological complexity of creating effective mechanisms for regulating the labor market in the context of digitalization, it is an objective phenomenon. The crisis that has developed in the world economy prevents the resolution of legal conflicts arising in the field of employment. The problems of regulation of labor relations and the formation of mechanisms for the implementation of social policy in the context of a digitalizing labor market must be perceived only as separate “mosaic pieces” in a single canvas of social problems of modern society in the period of its transformation. When solving this problem, we can talk about choosing from two possible options: either about the return of relations in the sphere of labor to the field of social relations in the legal sense, or about recreating the state system of social protection of the population, taking into account the possibilities of its customization of the functions of public administration, which are given by the universal digitalization.

Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyje otnoshenija. 2022 Issue 10
Source
About authors
Elena Sadovaya
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO)
References

1. Sadovaya E. Digital economy and a new paradigm of the labor market. World Economy and International Relation, 2018, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 35-45. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-12-35-45

2. Sadovaya E. Social challenges of the digital economy: Russia on a global scale. World Economy and International Relation, 2021, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 14-24. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-9-14-24

3. Platform employment as a tool for labor socialization of representatives of generation Z. Abaeva A.L., Boldyreva M.V., Golovoi A.G., Gurieva M.T., eds. September, 2021. 67 p. (In Russ.) Available at: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:m6t7_Ht4tJ8J:kafmr.rggu.ru/index.php%3Fs%3Dfile_download%26id%3D2809+&cd=1&hl=ru&ct=clnk&gl=ru (accessed 10.03.2022).

4. Gusenko M. New forms of employment have become popular in Russia. Rossiiskaya gazeta, 29.11.2018. (In Russ.) Available at: https://rg.ru/2018/11/29/v-rossii-stali-populiarny-novye-formy-zaniatosti.html (accessed 10.03.2022).

5. Choudary S.P. The architecture of digital labour platforms: Policy recommendations on platform design for worker well-being. International Labour Office – Geneva: ILO, 2018. 55 p. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---cabinet/documents/publication/wcms_630603.pdf (accessed 10.03.2022).

6. Ignatova O. Why companies hire self-employed people. Rossiiskaya gazeta, 27.10.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://rg.ru/2021/10/27/zachem-kompanii-nanimaiut-na-rabotu-samozaniatyh.html (accessed 10.03.2022).

7. Pesole A., Urzì Brancati C., Fernández-Macías E., Biagi F., González Vázquez I. Platform workers in Europe. Evidence from the COLLEEM Survey. EUR 29275 EN. Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2018. 61 p. DOI:10.2760/742789

8. Chernykh E.A. The quality of platform employment: unstable (precarious) forms, regulatory practices, challenges for Russia. Standard of living of the population of Russian regions, 2020, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 82-97. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.19181/lsprr.2020.16.3.7

9. Penikas G. Unwilling Entrepreneurs. Why Explosive Small Business Growth Isn't Always a Good Thing. iq.hse.ru, 10.03.2022 (In Russ.) Available at: https://iq.hse.ru/news/535185657.html (accessed 10.03.2022).

10. Bögenhold D., Klinglmair R., Kandutsch F. Solo Self-Employment, Human Capital and Hybrid Labour in the Gig Economy. Foresight and STI Governance, 2017, vol. 11, no. 4, рp. 23-32. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2017.4.23.32

11. Bobkov V.N. Unstable employment in the Russian Federation: the state and directions of decline. Population, 2019, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 91-104. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.19181/1561-7785-2019-00018

12. De Stefano V. and Aloisi A. European Legal framework for digital labour platforms. European Commission, Luxembourg, 2018. 66 p. DOI: 10.2760/78590

13. Platform employment: definition and regulation. The report. Author's Team: Sinyavskaya O.V., Biryukova S.S., Aptekar A.P., Gorvat E.S., Grishchenko N.B., Gudkova T.B., Kareva D.E. National Research University Higher School of Economics, Institute for Social Policy. – Moscow, NRU HSE, 2021. 78 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://ncmu.hse.ru/data/2021/05/26/1438190156/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4_%D0%9F%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C_002.pdf (accessed 10.03.2022).

14. Lyutov N.L. New forms of labor relations and adaptation of classical norms of labor law to the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Labor Law: National and International Dimension. Vol. 2: Transformation of labor relations and problems of separate institutes of labor law. Atypical Employment. Moscow, Yuridicheskoe izdatel'stvo "Norma", 2022, pp. 83-112. DOI: 10.12737/1859092

15. Charlton E. What is the gig economy and what's the deal for gig workers? WEF, 26.05.2021. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/05/what-gig-economy-workers/ (accessed 10.03.2022).

16. Solovieva O. In Russia, there are almost no unemployed who want to work. Nezavisimaya gazeta, 28.10.2021. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.ng.ru/economics/2021-10-28/1_8290_unemployed.html (accessed 10.03.2022).

17. Ponomareva M. Business supported the idea of the Ministry of Labor to regulate platform employment. Rossiiskaya gazeta, 13.04.2022. (In Russ.) Available at: https://rg.ru/2022/04/13/biznes-podderzhal-ideiu-mintruda-po-regulirovaniiu-platformennoj-zaniatosti.html (accessed 10.03.2022).

18. Udovenko I.P. Digital technologies as a tool for the liberalization of family policy: the prospect of gaining sustainability. Social and labor research, 2021, no. 2 (43), pp. 151-162. (In Russ.) DOI 10.34022/2658-3712-2021-43-2-151-162.

Similar
Digital Economy and a New Paradigm of the Labor Market
Sadovaya E.
Precarious employment: Methodology of measurement
Kuchenkova A.
GIGONOMICS AS A NEW SOCIO-ECONOMIC MODEL: DEVELOPMENT OF FREELANCING AND CROWDSOURCING
Lapidus L., Polyakova J.
Employment Precarization: Discussion on the Essence and Ways of Measuring
Popov A., Soloveva T.
Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас
На месяц
490 Р / Month
На полугодие
390 Р / Month
2,340 Р за 6 месяцев
На год
290 Р / Month
3,480 Р за год