1. Аркадьев 2012 — ​Arkadiev P. M. Aspectual system of Lithuanian (in areal perspective). Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. No. 6: Tipologiya aspektual’nykh sistem i kategorii (= Acta Linguistica Petropolitana, 2012, vol. VIII, part 2). Plungian V. A. (ed.). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2012, 45–121.

2. Аркадьев 2016 — ​Arkadiev P. M. Interaction of perfect and negation in Lithuanian: Areal and typological perspective. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. No. 7: Tipologiya perfekta. (= Acta Linguistica Petropolitana, 2016, vol. XII, part 2). Maisak T. A., Plungian V. A., Semionova X. P. (eds.). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2016, 115–163.

3. Вимер 2007 — ​Wiemer B. Indirect evidentiality in Lithuanian. Evidentsial’nost’ v yazykakh Evropy i Azii. Xrakovskij V. S. (ed.). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2007, 197–240.

4. Вострикова 2010 — ​Vostrikova N. V. Tipologiya sredstv vyrazheniya eksperientivnogo znacheniya [Typology of experiential marking]. Ph.D. diss. Moscow: Moscow State Univ., 2010.

5. Генюшене 1989 — ​Geniušienė E. Š. On interaction of perfect and aspect in Lithuanian. Baltistica, 1989, 3(2): 285–291.

6. Генюшене 1990 — ​Geniušienė E. Š. Perfect and aspect in Lithuanian. Tipologiya i grammatika. Xrakovskij V. S. (ed.). Leningrad: Nauka, 1990, 135–140.

7. Генюшене 2020 — ​Geniušienė E. Š. Aspect and tense in Lithuanian. Ierarkhiya i vzaimodeistvie grammaticheskikh kategorii glagola. Xrakovskij V. S., Malchukov A. L. (eds.). St. Petersburg: Institute of Linguistic Studies, 2020, 503–540.

8. Генюшене, Недялков 1983 — ​Geniušienė E. Š., Nedjalkov V. P. Resultative, passive and perfect in Lithuanian. Tipologiya rezul’tativnykh konstruktsii. Nedjalkov V. P. (ed.). Leningrad: Nauka, 1983, 160–166.

9. Ландер 2003 — ​Lander Yu. A. Perfect and definite positional time adverbials. Yazyki mira. Tipologiya. Uralistika. Pamyati T. Zhdanovoi. Stat’i i vospominaniya. Plungian V. A., Urmanchieva A. Yu. (comp.). Moscow: Indrik, 2003, 300–312.

10. Недялков, Яхонтов 1983 — ​Nedjalkov V. P., Yakhontov S. E. Typology of resultative constructions. Tipologiya rezul’tativnykh konstruktsii. Nedjalkov V. P. (ed.). Leningrad: Nauka, 1983, 5–40.

11. Падучева 2010 — ​Paducheva E. V. Eventive and statal meanings of perfective verbs in Russian. Problemy grammatiki i tipologii. Sbornik statei pamyati V. P. Nedyalkova. Vydrin V. F. et al. (eds.). Moscow: Znak, 2010, 240–252.

12. Пенькова 2018 — ​Penkova Y. A. From retrospective to prospective: Grammaticalization of future anterior in the languages of Europe. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 2018, 2: 53–70.

13. Пенькова 2019 — ​Penkova Y. A. Modal and evidential strategies for future anterior in European languages: Questionnaire and corpus data. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 2019, 6: 7–31.

14. Плунгян 2001 — ​Plungian V. A. Antiresultative: Before and after the result. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. No. 1: Grammaticheskie kategorii. Plungian V. A. (ed.). Moscow: Russkie Slovari, 2001, 50–88.

15. Сведенцова 2003 — ​Svedentsova E. A. Perfectivity, resultativity and inferentiality in Lithuanian: Combination of meanings and syncretism of forms. Grammaticheskie kategorii: ierarkhii, svyazi, vzaimodeistvie. Conf. proceedings (St. Petersburg, 2003). Xrakovskij V. S. (ed.). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2003, 147–151.

16. Сичинава 2013 — ​Sitchinava D. V. Tipologiya plyuskvamperfekta. Slavyanskii plyuskvamperfekt [Typology of pluperfect. Slavic pluperfect]. Moscow: AST-Press, 2013.

17. Сичинава 2016 — ​Sitchinava D. V. European perfect through the lens of a parallel corpus. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. No. 7: Tipologiya perfekta. (= Acta Linguistica Petropolitana, 2016, vol. XII, part 2). Maisak T. A., Plungian V. A., Semionova X. P. (eds.). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2016, 85–114.

18. Arkadiev, Daugavet 2016 — ​Arkadiev P. M., Daugavet A. D. The perfect in Lithuanian and Latvian: A contrastive and comparative study. Talk at Chronos 12 (Caen, 2016).

19. Arkadiev et al. 2015 — ​Arkadiev P. M., Holvoet A., Wiemer B. Introduction. Baltic linguistics: State of the art. Contemporary approaches to Baltic linguistics. Arkadiev P., Holvoet A., Wiemer B. (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2015, 1–109.

20. Arkadiev, Wiemer 2020 — ​Arkadiev P. M., Wiemer B. Perfects in Baltic and Slavic. Perfects in Indo-European languages and beyond. Crellin R., Jügel Th. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2020, 123–214.

21. Breitbarth 2005 — ​Breitbarth A. Live fast, die young—the short life of Early Modern German auxiliary ellipsis. Utrecht: LOT Publications, 2005.

22. Cable 2017 — ​Cable S. The implicatures of optional past tense in Tlingit and the implications for ‘discontinuous past’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2017, 35(3): 635–681.

23. Comrie 1976 — ​Comrie B. Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1976.

24. Dahl 1985 — ​Dahl Ö. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.

25. Dahl 2021 — ​Dahl Ö. “Universal” readings of perfects and iamitives in typological perspective. The perfect volume: Papers on the perfect. Eide K. M., Fryd M. (eds.), Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2021, 44–63.

26. Dahl (ed.) 2000 — ​Dahl Ö. (ed.). Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000.

27. Dahl, Hedin 2000 — ​Dahl Ö., Hedin E. Current relevance and event reference. Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Dahl Ö. (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000, 385–401.

28. Daugavet, Holvoet 2019 — ​Daugavet A. D., Holvoet A. An elusive experiential tense construction in Latvian. Baltic Linguistics, 2019, 10 (Special issue “Minor grams in Baltic, Slavonic and Fennic”): 109–153.

29. DLKT — ​Корпус современного литовского литературного языка, tekstynas.vdu.lt

30. Geniušienė, Nedjalkov 1988 — ​Geniušienė E., Nedjalkov V. P. Resultative, passive, and perfect in Lithuanian. Typology of resultative constructions. Nedjalkov V. P. (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1988, 369–386.

31. Grönn 2004 — ​Grönn A. The semantics and pragmatics of the Russian factual imperfective. Ph.D. diss. Univ. of Oslo, 2004.

32. Grønn, von Stechow 2017 — ​Grønn A., von Stechow A. The perfect. The Wiley Blackwell companion to semantics. Gutzmann D., Matthewson L., Meier C., Rullmann H., Zimmermann Th. E. (eds.). To appear. Online version of 2017: https://www.hf.uio.no/ilos/personer/vit/atleg/perfect_gronn_stechow_oct2017.pdf.

33. Holvoet 2001 — ​Holvoet A. Studies in the Latvian verb. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2001.

34. Holvoet 2007 — ​Holvoet A. Mood and modality in Baltic. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2007.

35. Iatridou et al. 2001 — ​Iatridou S., Anagnostopoulou E., Izvorski R. Observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. Ken Hale: A life in language. Kenstowicz M. (ed.). Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 2001, 189–238.

36. Kehayov 2008 — ​Kehayov P. An areal-typological perspective to evidentiality: The cases of the Balkan and Baltic linguistic areas. (Dissertationes Linguisticae Universitatis Tartuensis, 10.) Tartu: Tartu Univ. Press, 2008.

37. Larsson 2009 — ​Larsson I. Participles in time. The development of the perfect tenses in Swedish. Gothenburg: Gothenburg Univ., 2009.

38. Lindstedt 2000 — ​Lindstedt J. The perfect — ​aspectual, temporal and evidential. Dahl Ö. (ed.). Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000, 365–383.

39. Mathiassen 1996 — ​Mathiassen T. Tense, mood and aspect in Lithuanian and Latvian. (Meddelelser av Slavisk-baltisk avdeling, Universitetet i Oslo, Nr. 75.) Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo, 1996.

40. Nau 2005 — ​Nau N. Perfekts un saliktā tagadne latviešu valodā. Baltu filoloģija, 2005, 14(2): 137–154.

41. Plungian, van der Auwera 2006 — ​Plungian V. P., van der Auwera J. Towards a typology of discontinuous past marking. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 2006, 59(4), 317–349.

42. Sakurai 2015 — ​Sakurai E. Past habitual tense in Lithuanian. Contemporary approaches to Baltic linguistics. Arkadiev P., Holvoet A., Wiemer B. (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2015, 384–436.

43. Sakurai 2016 — ​Sakurai E. The perfect in Lithuanian: An empirical study. Valoda: Nozīme un forma. 7. Gramatika un saziņa. Kalnača A., Lokmane I., Horiguči D. (red.). Riga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 2016, 189–208.

44. Salkie 1989 — ​Salkie R. Perfect and pluperfect: What is the relationship  Journal of Linguistics, 1989, 25(1): 1–34.

45. Sawicki 2010 — ​Sawicki L. Preverbation and narrativity in Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics, 2010, 1: 167–193.

46. Servaitė 1986 — ​Servaitė L. Rezultatinės būsenos reikšmė lietuvių kalbos veiksmažodžių sudurtinių formų sistemoje (rezultatyvas). Kalbotyra, 1986, 36(1): 63–71.

47. Servaitė 1988 — ​Servaitė L. Subjektinis rezultatyvas lietuvių kalboje (Perfekto formos su rezultatinės būsenos reikšme). Kalbotyra, 1988, 39(1): 81–89.

48. Squartini 1999 — ​Squartini M. On the semantics of the pluperfect: Evidence from Germanic and Romance. Linguistic Typology, 1999, 3(1): 51–89.

49. Wälchli 2000 — ​Wälchli B. Infinite predication as a marker of evidentiality and modality in the languages of the Baltic region. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 2000, 53(2): 186–210.

50. Wiemer 2010 — ​Wiemer B. Lithuanian esą — ​a heterosemic reportative marker in its contemporary usage. Baltic Linguistics, 2010, 1: 245–308.

51. Wiemer 2012 — ​Wiemer B. The Lithuanian have-resultative — ​a typological curiosum  Lingua Posnansiensis, 2012, 54(2): 69–81.

52. Willett 1988 — ​Willett Th. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 1988, 12(1): 51–97.