18.97.14.86
Reflection as activity: definition, schematization, reflexive cycle, and reflexive practices
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
160


Downloads
0
UDC
1 ФИЛОСОФИЯ. ПСИХОЛОГИЯ
Date of publication
30.05.2023
Public year
2023
DOI
10.18254/S271326680025677-4
Reflection as activity: definition, schematization, reflexive cycle, and reflexive practices
Annotation

The article discusses the definition of reflection as an activity and examines the main factors that determine the kinds of reflection. According to the author of the article, reflection as an activity can be defined by the following formula: the direction of attention to EXPERIENCE for the “detection” of its FORMS and their fixation by means of certain SEMIOTIC TOOLS carried out for the sake of achieving some PURPOSE. In this formulation, the terms “experience”, “form”, “semiotic tools”, “purpose” are understood as parameters, the specification of which sets the description of certain kinds of reflection. In addition, the structure of “detection” participates in the formation of reflection, which consists of the languages of description, conceptual and terminological apparatus, knowledge and other conceptual means of the reflecting subject. Variants for specifying the parameters of the definition are considered in the article on the material of various philosophical techniques (mainly domestic tradition) and a number of general cultural reflexive practices. The author correlates his understanding of reflection with a number of ideas of the Moscow Methodological Circle (MMC), in which reflection techniques were given great importance. In particular, the author schematizes his understanding as a special case of an “act of activity”, the idea of which is the development within the MMC of some of K. Marx’s ideas. In connection with the clarification of the temporal structure of reflection (which is not grasped by schematization of reflection as an act of activity), the author introduces the idea of an elementary cycle of reflection and fixes it in the form of a scheme. In conclusion, the author examines the question of the correlation of reflection and thinking and considers the possibilities of correlating his definition of reflection with the typology of reflection set by the scheme of the thinking-communication-activity-system (proposed in MMC in 1983).

About authors
Taras Shiyan
The Foundation "Center for Humanities Research"
References

1. Yaspers K. Istoki istorii i ee tsel' / Karl Yaspers. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. M.: Politizdat, 1991.

2. Pyatigorskij A. M. Vvedenie v izuchenie buddijskoj filosofii. M.: NLO, 2007.

3. Orlova Yu. O. Ponyatiya appertseptsii i refleksii u Kanta i ponyatie refleksii u Gusserlya // Mezhdu metafizikoj i opytom. Materialy kollokviuma «Vliyanie nemetskoj filosofii na russkuyu filosofiyu s XIX veka do nachala XX veka i dal'nejshee razvitie filosofii v Germanii i v Rossii» (Gejdel'berg, 21– 25 maya 2000 g.) SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obschestvo, 2001.

4. Ehmbri L. Refleksivnyj analiz. Pervonachal'noe vvedenie v fenomenologiyu. M.: Tri kvadrata, 2005.

5. Ryabushkina T. M. Poznanie i refleksiya. M.: Kanon+, 2014.

6. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma // Kant. I. Sochineniya v 6-ti tt. M., 1964. T. 3.

7. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. M.: Mysl', 1994.

8. Kant I. Sochineniya. T. II. Chast' 1. Kritika chistogo razuma. 2-e izdanie (B). M.: Nauka, 2006.

9. Molchanov V. I. Razlichenie i opyt: fenomenologiya neagressivnogo soznaniya. M., 2004.

10. Kalinichenko V. Priklyucheniya transtsendental'noj sub'ektivnosti // Logos, № 5 (78), 2010.

11. Shiyan T. A. Refleksiya: porozhdenie ili vyyavlenie intersub'ektivnogo? // Intersub'ektivnost' –Kommunikatsiya –Nauka. Rabochie materialy nauchnoj konferentsii. Sankt-Peterburg, 9– 11 maya 2008 g. S. 14– 15.

12. Shiyan T. A. K opredeleniyu refleksii kak deyatel'nosti // Transtsendental'nyj povorot v sovremennoj filosofii –7. Ehpistemologiya, kognitivistika i iskusstvennyj intellekt. Sbornik tezisov mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferentsii. M., 2022. S. 85– 88.

13. Shiyan T. A. Ob opredelenii refleksii kak deyatel'nosti // Transtsendental'nyj povorot v sovremennoj filosofii –7. Ehpistemologiya, kognitivistika i iskusstvennyj intellekt. Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferentsii. M., 2022. S. 72– 84.

14. Schedrovitskij G. P. Iskhodnye predstavleniya i kategorial'nye sredstva teorii deyatel'nosti // G. P. Schedrovitskij. Izbrannye trudy. M., 1995. S. 233– 280.

15. Pyatigorskij A. M. Izbrannye trudy. M.: Shkola «Yazyki russkoj kul'tury», 1996.

16. Mamardashvili M. K. Lektsii o Pruste. Audiozapis' iz sobraniya avtora.

17. Pyatigorskij A. M. Chto takoe politicheskaya filosofiya. M.: Izd-vo «Evropa», 2007.

18. Pyatigorskij A. M. Myshlenie i nablyudenie. Chetyre lektsii po observatsionnoj filosofii. Riga, 2002.

19. Schedrovitskij G. P. Opyt logicheskogo analiza rassuzhdenij («Aristarkh Samosskij») // G. P. Schedrovitskij. Filosofiya. Nauka. Metodologiya. M., 1997. S. 57– 202.

20. Kotel'nikov S. I., Schedrovitskij G. P. Organizatsionno-deyatel'nostnaya igra kak novaya forma organizatsii i metod razvitiya kollektivnoj mysledeyatel'nosti // G. P. Schedrovitskij. Izbrannye trudy. M., 1995. S. 115– 142.

21. Schedrovitskij G. P. Skhema mysledeyatel'nosti –sistemno-strukturnoe stroenie, smysl i soderzhanie // G. P. Schedrovitskij. Izbrannye trudy. M., 1995. S. 281– 298.

22. Kuznetsova N. I. Prezentizm i antikvarizm –dve kartiny proshlogo / Arbor Mundi. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal po teorii i istorii mirovoj kul'tury. Vyp. 15. M., 2009.

23. Vol'f M. N. Sovremennye diskussii ob istorii filosofii: protivostoyanie teksta i konteksta // Sibirskij filosofskij zhurnal. 2017. T. 15, № 2. S. 237– 257.

24. Smirnov A. V. Sobytie i veschi. M.: OOO «Sadra»; Izd. dom YaSK, 2017.

25. Sekst Ehmpirik. Sochineniya v 2-kh tt. T. 1. M., 1975.

26. Diogen Laehrtskij. O zhizni, ucheniyakh i izrecheniyakh znamenitykh filosofov. M., 1986.

27. Lukasevich Ya. Aristotelevskaya sillogistika s tochki zreniya sovremennoj formal'noj logiki. Birobidzhan, 2000.

28. Kneale M., Kneale W. The Development of Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.

29. Styazhkin N. I. Formirovanie matematicheskoj logiki. M., 1967.

30. Stolyarov A. A. Stoya i stoitsizm. M., 1995.

31. Aristotel'. Pervaya Analitika // Aristotel'. Sochineniya v 4-kh tt. T. 2. M., 1978.

32. Schedrovitskij G. P. «Yazykovoe myshlenie» i ego analiz // G. P. Schedrovitskij. Izbrannye trudy. M., 1995. S. 449– 465.

33. Alekseev N. G., Kostelovskij V. A. , Schedrovitskij G. P. Printsip «parallelizma formy i soderzhaniya myshleniya» i ego znachenie dlya traditsionnykh logicheskikh i psikhologicheskikh issledovanij. Soobscheniya I– IV // G. P. Schedrovitskij. Izbrannye trudy. M., 1995. S. 1– 33.

34. Schedrovitskij G. P. O razlichii iskhodnykh ponyatij «formal'noj» i «soderzhatel'noj» logik // G. P. Schedrovitskij. Izbrannye trudy. M., 1995. S. 34– 49.

35. Schedrovitskij G. P. Problemy metodologii sistemnogo issledovaniya. M.: 1964.

36. Rozin V. M. Semioticheskie issledovaniya. M., 2001.

37. Kuznetsova N. I. Nestandartnaya ehpistemologiya v otechestvennom ispolnenii (sravnitel'nyj analiz kontseptsij G. P. Schedrovitskogo i M. A. Rozova) // Ehpistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2012. T. XXXII. № 2. S. 184– 200.

38. Ado P. Chto takoe antichnaya filosofiya? M., 1999.

39. Romanov V. N. Ispoved' nauchnogo rabotnika, ili Uteshenie metodologiej // Tri podkhoda k izucheniyu kul'tury / Pod red. Vyach. Vs. Ivanova. M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo un-ta, 1997. S. 93– 126.

40. Panov E. N. Znaki, simvoly, yazyki: Kommunikatsiya v tsarstve zhivotnykh i v mire lyudej. M.: LENAND, 2022.

41. McGrew W .C. The intelligent use of tools: Twenty propositions // Tools, language and cognition in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. P. 151– 170.

42. Boesch C. Teaching in wild chimpanzees // Animal Behavior. 1991. Vol . 41. P . 530– 532.

43. Zorina Z. A. , Smirnova A. A. O chem rasskazali «govoryaschie» obez'yany: Sposobny li vysshie zhivotnye operirovat' simvolami? / Nauch. red. d. biol. n. I. I. Poletaeva; Predisl. A. D. Kosheleva ; Poslesl. Vyach. Vs. Ivanova i A. D. Kosheleva. M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2006.

Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас