18.97.14.85
Infinity and Transcendence: Husserl, Heidegger and Tengelyi
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
1617


Downloads
254
UDC
1 ФИЛОСОФИЯ. ПСИХОЛОГИЯ
Date of publication
30.12.2020
Public year
2020
DOI
10.18254/S271326680011873-0
Infinity and Transcendence: Husserl, Heidegger and Tengelyi
Annotation

Laszlo Tengelyi’s phenomenological project, as presented in his book “World and infinity. To the problem of the phenomenological metaphysics”, published posthumously, is founded on the idea of the infinity of the world. In rehabilitating the husserlian thesis of the infinity as constitutive feature of the worldly experience, Tengelyi departs from the phenomenology of the finitude, which goes back to Heidegger. The article analyzes the origins of the infinity/finitude dilemma in transcendental phenomenology of the world in Husserl, Heidegger and Tengelyi. It demonstrates that the dilemma is rooted in the ambiguity of the phenomenological concept of transcendence. On the one hand, the transcendence is interpreted as the essential openness of the experience, which renders it infinite. On the other hand, the openness is constituted by horizon as the finitude of the experience.

About authors
Mikhail Belousov
assistant professor
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Russian State University for the Humanitites
References

1. Tengelyi L. Welt und Unendlichkeit. Zum Problem ph?nomenologischer Metaphysik. Freiburg/M?nchen: Verlag Karl Alber, 2014.

2. Gusserl’, E. (2018). Ideja fenomenologii. Pjat lekcii. Sankt-Petersburg: Gumanitarnaja Akademija (in Russian).

3. Gusserl’, E. (2011). Logicheskie issledovanija. Tom I. Moscow: Akadenicheskii proekt (in Russian).

4. Gusserl’, E. Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band. Zweiter Teil. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1984.

5. Brentano, F. (1996). Izbrannye raboty. Moscow: Dom intellektualnoi knigi (in Russian).

6. Gusserl’, E. (2011). Logicheskie issledovanija. Tom II. Chast I. Moscow: Akadenicheskii proekt (in Russian).

7. Gusserl’, E. (2009). Idei k chistoi fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoi filosofii. Kniga pervaja: Obschchee vvedenie v chistuyu fenomenologiyu. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt (in Russian).

8. Husserl E. Zur ph?nomenologischen Reduktion. Texte aus dem Nachlass. 1926-1935. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.

9. Chernavin, G. (2018). Neponyatnost samo soboi razumeiushegosya. Sankt-Petersburg, Moscow: Dobrosvet (in Russian).

10. Kheld, K. (2009). “Bog v fenomenologii Edmunda Gusserlya” Ezhegodnik po fenomenologicheskoi filosofii, 2010, Vol. II, pp. 15-30 (In Russian).

11. Chernavin, G. (2013). Teleologia soglasovannosti opyta v fenomenologii Gusserlya. In: Horizon. Fenomenologicheskie issledovanija. 2 (1), pp. 28-47 (in Russian).

12. Chernavin G. Erscheinung in der Schwebe zwischen Sein und Schein: von Herbart zu Husserl // Horizon. Fenomenologicheskie issledovanija. Ò. 2. ¹2. 2013. Pp. 7-16.

13. Geniusas S. The origins of the horizon in Husserl’s phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.

14. Husserl E. Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916-1937). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2008.

15. Gusserl’, E. (2004). Krizis evropeiskikh nauk i transcendentalnaja fenomenoogija. Vvedenie v fenomenologicheskuiu filosofiiu. Moscow: Vladimir Dal (in Russian).

16. Khaidegger, M. (1998). Prolegomeny k istorii ponatija vremeni. Tomsk: Vodolei (in Russian).

17. Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit. T?bingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 2001.

18. Chernyakov, A. (2008). V poiskakh osnovaniya ontologii: subjekt ili ipostas’? In: Ezhegodnik po fenomenologicheskoi filosofii. Vypusk I, pp. 237-261 (in Russian).

19. Chernyakov, A. (1997). Strekalo voprosa. In: Khaidegger, M. Vvedenie v metafiziku. Sankt-Petersburg: Vysshaya religiozno-filosofkaya shkola (in Russian).

20. Belousov, M (2019). Dannost kak problema fenomenologii. In: Horizon. Fenomenologicheskie issledovanija. T. 8 (2), pp. 536-572 (in Russian).

21. Kant, I. (2006). Sochineniya na nemetskom i russkom yazykakh. Tom 2. Chast 1. Kritika chistogo razuma. Vtoroye izdanie (B), 1787. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).

22. Marion, J-L. Nashyshennyi fenomen. In: Yampolskaya, A. Sholokhova S. (ed.), Postfenomenologiya: novaya fenomenologiya vo Frantsii I za ee predelami, pp. 63-99. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt (in Russian).

23. Tengeli, L. (2013). Neobkhodimost fakticheskogo u Aristotelya i Gusserlya: dva osnovopolozheniya metafisiki. Ezhegodnik po fenomenologicheskoi filosofii. Vypusk III, pp. 190-208.

24. Tengelyi L. Philosophie als Weltoffenheit. In: Deutsche Zeitschrift f?r Philosophie 63/5, S. 958-976.

25. Khel’d, K. (2008). Khaidegger i printsip fenomenologii. In: Ezhegodnik po fenomenologicheskoi filosofii. Vypusk I, pp. 190-220 (in Russian).

Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас