18.97.9.174
The Relationship of Racial Identity and Language in American Ideology
The Relationship of Racial Identity and Language in American Ideology
Annotation

The article examines the relationship between the concepts of racial identity and language in the American linguistic ideology, which are most clearly reflected in the changes in the racial classification and scenarios of the US census. Racial identity cultivated in the United States is a legacy of hegemonic ideology and implies the legal and social division of people with differences into different races. Linguistic ideologies have influenced the legitimization of racial categories and their integration into the structure of American identity. The immigration and citizenship debate has played a key role in the formalization and reformalization of American races. The use of the language-race ligament, traditional for the American racial and linguistic ideology of the 19th century and using the concept of the mother language to identify races, in practice turned out to be difficult due to the objective difficulty of determining the mother language of a person. In parallel with the use of language as an indicator of race, the connection between language and national identity was strengthened, reinforced by the three-part ideological construct “White race – English language – American identity”. The ideological link between national identity and Anglo-Saxon racial identity has led to changes in immigration policy and calls for racial restrictions on immigration. In the ever-changing classification of races, language has invariably been an important component of individual identity and has played a key role in shaping racial categories. Today, the ideological basis for differences between groups is not physical, but cultural characteristics. This transition led to the emergence of a new discourse of marginalization: the responsibility for socioeconomic oppression rests with the oppressed themselves, ostensibly unwilling to accept the cultural values and behaviors that lead to social and economic success.

References

1. Gibson C., Jung K.Historical Census Statistics on Population Totals By Race, 1790 to 1990, and By Hispanic Origin, 1970 to 1990, For The United States, Regions, Divisions, and States. Working Paper Series № 56. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau, 2002. Available at: http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0056.html (accessed: 04.01.2021).

2. Theodore Roosevelt's Stance on Immigrants (1907). Available at: https://www.liveabout.com/what-theodore-roosevelt-said-about-immigrants-3957346 (accessed: 02.02.2021).

3. US Census. 13th Census of the United States (1910). Vol. 1 (Population). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1913 // Available at: https://archive.org/details/1910_census (accessed: 11.01.2021).

4. US Census. Development of Racial and Ethnic terms for the 1990 Census. New Orleans: Population Association of America, 1998.

5. US Census. Measuring America: The Decennial Censuses From 1790 to 2000. Washington DC, 2002. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/pol02marv-pt2.pdf (accessed: 05.01.2021).

6. US Senate Immigration Commission (Dillingham Commission). Abstracts of the Immigration Commission, with Conclusions, Recommendations and Views of the Minority. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1911. 864 r.

7. Marusenko M.A., Marusenko N.M. Perepisi naseleniya v SShA i rasovyj vopros // SShA & Kanada: ehkonomika, politika, kul'tura. 2019. № 6 (48). S. 5-21. DOI: 10.31857/S032120680005176-7

8. Bonfiglio P. T.Race and the Rise of Standard American. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2002. 258 r.

9. Cameron C.D.R. 1997. How the García cousins lost their accents: Understanding the language of Title VII decisions approving English-only rules as the product of racial dualism, Latino invisibility, and legal indeterminacy // California Law Review. 1997. № 85. R. 1347–1393.

10. Curry-Stevens A. & Coalition of Communities of Color. The Slavic Community in Multnomah County: An Unsettling Profile. Portland, OR: Portland State University, 2014. 87 r.

11. Jacobson M.F. Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998. 338 r.

12. Leeman J. Racializing language. A history of linguistic ideologies in the US Census // Journal of Language and Politics. 2004. Vol.3(3). P. 534.

13. Pavlenko A. “We have room but for one language here”: Language and national identity at the turn of the 20th century // Multilingua. 2002. № 21. R. 163–196.

14. Rodríguez C. Changing Race: Latinos, the Census, and the History of Ethnicity in the United States. New York: New York University Press, 2000. 283 p.

15. Skutnabb-Kangas T., Dunbar R. Indigenous Children’s Education as Linguistic Genocide and a Crime Against Humanity? A Global View // GálduČála – Journal of Indigenous Peoples Rights. 2010. № 1. 128 p.

16. Urciuoli B. Exposing Prejudice: Puerto Rican Experiences of Language, Race, and Class. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1996. 244 r.

Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас