18.97.14.89
Perspectives of development of transboundary tourist recreational regions in the border zone of Russia with Estonia and Latvia
Perspectives of development of transboundary tourist recreational regions in the border zone of Russia with Estonia and Latvia
Annotation

The research was conducted in the framework of the theory of transboundary tourist recreational region formation, developed in the beginning of 21st century. The theory proposes a designation of transboundary tourist recreational regions at the basis of entirety of features and additional signs. Based on them, there were designed several transboundary tourist recreational regions of meso- and micro-level. The novelty of the research is the designation of main factors of transboundary tourist recreational region formation, that allowed to evaluate the modern state and perspective of development of different types of tourism at the level of transboundary tourist recreational regions of micro-level. For majority of tourism types the leading positions are taken by transboundary tourist recreational micro-regions of the first order: “Ivangorod — Narva”, “Pskov — Tartu” and “Pskov — Sigulda”. They also have the most favourable perspectives of development for different types of tourism. Micro-regions of the second order: “Pytalovo — Rezekne” and “Sebezh — Rezekne” visibly concede on modern level and perspectives of development of different tourism types to the above-mentioned micro-regions, though the latter microregion can successfully specialize on development of environmental tourism and recreation. Also, there are fairly good perspectives of development of recreation in the potential tourist recreational microregion of the third order “Prichudsky” in case of establishment of transboundary water transportation on Pskovsko-Chudskoye Lake. An exceptional position is taken by a microregion of the third order “Setomaa/Izborsko-Pechorsky area”, which is at the “core” of Russian-Estonian-Latvian transboundary mesoregion. It also has resources for development of the most tourism types and is characterized by the most favourable perspectives for international cooperation in the this field.

About authors
References

1. 1. Golomidova Е. S. (2017), Assessment of the development potential of a transbondary recreational region «Pskov — Pechory — Tartu», Tourist and recreational potential, natural and cultural heritage of Eastern Europe. Materials of the International scientific and practical conference, Pskov, pp. 116–122. (In Russ.).

2. Korneevets V. S. (2010), International, transnational and transboundary regions: features, characteristics, hierarchy, Vestnik RGU im. I. Kanta, no. 1, pp. 27–34. (In Russ.).

3. Korneevets V. S. (2010), Formation of transboundary mesoregions in the Baltic, Кaliningrad, 80 p. (In Russ.).

4. Kropinova E. G. (2016), Cross-border tourist and recreational regions in the Baltic sea, Kaliningrad, 272 p. (In Russ.).

5. Мanakov А. G., Golomidova Е. S., Ivanov I. А. (2019), Estimation of the size of the tourist flow within the trounsboundary tourist and recreational regions in the north-western border of Russia, Izvestiya Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva, vol. 151, no. 5, pp. 18–31. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S0869-6071151518-31.

6. Мanakov А. G., Golomidova Е. S. (2018), Cross-border tourist and recreational regions in adjacent territories of Russia, Estonia and Latvia, Geograficheskii vestnik, no. 2 (45), pp.156–166. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/2079-7877-2018-2-156-166.

7. Мanakov А. G. (2019), Transboundary tourist regional formation on the border territories of Russia with Finland, Estonia and Latvia, Baltic Region — Cooperation Region — 2019, Materials of the III International scientific and practical conference, Kaliningrad, pp. 46–55. (In Russ.).

8. Manakov A. G. (2019), Transboundary tourist and recreational regions as a new form of territorial organization of the tourism sector, Tourism and hospitality industry: current status and development trends, Materials of the International scientific conference, Pskov, pp. 27–32. (In Russ.).

9. Rafailova G., Kadieva S., Kozhuharova L., Yancheva K., Krusteva A., Plyakov S. (2012), Specialized types of tourism, Varna, Science and Economics Publishing House, University of Economics — Varna, 282 p.(In Bolg.).

10. Fedorov G. М., Korneevets V. S. (2011), Regionalization and Formation of Transboundary Regions, Socio-economic geography — 2011: Theory and practice, Kaliningrad, pp. 285–292. (In Russ.).

11. Fedorov G., Korneevets V. (2010), Trans-border regionalisation in the conditions of globalisation, Baltic Region, 2010, no. 4 (6), pp. 92–102, DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2010-4-10

12. Fedorov G., Korneevets V. (2009), Trans-border regions in the system of the regional hierarchy: the systemic approach, Baltic Region, no. 2, pp. 26–33, DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2009-2-3

13. Kropinova E. G. (2011), The factors affecting the development of the South-Eastern Baltic tourism and recreation region, Baltic Region, no. 1 (7), pp. 93–100, DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2011-1-12

14. Manakov A. G., Golomidova E. S. (2018), Estimating the development of the Latvian-Estonian-Russian transboundary tourism and recreation region, Baltic Region, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 130–141, DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2018-1-8

15. Zaitseva N. A., Kropinova E. G. (2016), Problems and prospects of cross-border cooperation in tourism between Russia and Europe, Baltic Region, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 98–108, DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2016-3-8.

Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас