18.97.14.89
Transformation in the urban landscape of post-Soviet countries (the case study of Tashkent, Baku and Minsk)
Transformation in the urban landscape of post-Soviet countries (the case study of Tashkent, Baku and Minsk)
Annotation

Currently, each country of the post-Soviet space is building its own new geographical picture of the world. The article examines cultural and geographic processes across near-abroad countries. The capitals of three countries of different post-Soviet regions with different cultural traditions were chosen for a case study.

The proprietary methodology aimed at the study of the urban centre as the most informative space reflecting the political and cultural situation in the country. Along with traditional approaches, the methodology is based on a new geo-conceptual approach. It convincingly demonstrates that the Soviet model of the geographical space conceptualization has changed to national one in lots of post-Soviet countries. However, the intensity and tendency of the processes in each country differ from each other. A revolutionary approach characterized by active de-Sovietization of the urban landscape distinguishes Tashkent. Baku, first of all, preserves Azerbaijan Soviet heritage. Similar processes take place in the capitals of the national republics of the Russian Federation. On the contrary, the landscape of Minsk is distinguished by the preservation of the Soviet cultural heritage. Herewith the situation in Minsk is similar to the situation in most Russian regional capitals. It is worth noting that cultural and geographical situation in general is unstable. Leadership changes and foreign policy changes may lead to a new cultural policy and new developments of the urban landscape.

About authors
Vladimir Kalutskov
Professor
Department of Area Studies, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Areal Studies, the Moscow State University, Moscow
Anna Chugunkova
Master of Science
Department of Area Studies, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Areal Studies, the Moscow State University, Moscow
References

1. Antsiferov N. P. (1991), The soul of Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Lenizdat, 159 p. (In Russ.).

2. Kalutskov V. N. (2008), The landscape in cultural geography, Moscow, New Chronograph, 320 p. (In Russ.).

3. Kalutskov V. N. (2011), Ethnic and cultural landscape studies, Moscow, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography, 112 p. (In Russ.).

4. Kalutskov V. N., Ukhov S. Yu. (2019), Post-Soviet urban cultural landscape and its main trends, Geography of Uzbekistan and Russia: common challenges, potencial capacity and prospects for cooperation, executive eds: Holmatov F. H. and Druzhinin A. G., International scientific-practical conference proceedings (Tashkent, 13–19 of May, 2019), Tashkent, pp. 126–131. (In Russ.).

5. Lynch K. (1982), The image of the city, Moscow, Stroyizdat, 328 p. (In Russ.).

6. Mitin I. I. (2014), Place as palimpsest: A mythogeographical approach in cultural geography, Russian culture in the social geography: expert opinions, analysis, concepts, eds. Druzhinin A. G. and Streleckiy V. N., Rostov on Don, Publishing house of the Southern Federal University press, pp. 147–156. (In Russ.).

Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас