Американо-канадские отношения в сфере обороны после Холодной войны (1990-е годы)
Отзывы
Оценка читателей
0.0 (0 голосов)


Всего просмотров
2288


Скачивания
223
УДК
33 Экономика. Народное хозяйство. Экономические науки
93/94 История
32 Политика
Дата выпуска
01.10.2014
Год выпуска
2014
DOI
10.18254/S207054760011121-0
Американо-канадские отношения в сфере обороны после Холодной войны (1990-е годы)
Аннотация

Статья посвящена американо-канадским отношениям в сфере обороны в 1990-е годы. Основное внимание уделено адаптации старых двусторонних военных программ новым международным реальностям.

Об авторах
Володин Дмитрий Анатольевич
Ведущий научный сотрудник Института США и Канады РАН
Библиография

1. Цит. по: Канада 1918-1945. Исторический очерк. – М.: Наука, 1976, с. 359

2. Там же, с. 360

3. The Guide to Canadian Politics on Arms Control, Disarmament, Defence and Conflict Resolution. – Ottawa: Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security, 1990, p. 147

4. % Want an End to Cruise Testing // The Toronto Star, 26.02.1990

5. Ottawa Signs Cruise Missile Test Pact // The Toronto Star, 16.02.1993

6. Thompson A. PM Vows to Delay Missile Testing, Debate to be Held “to Review Policy” // The Toronto Star, 21.01.1994

7. House of Commons Debates. Official Report. 1st Session, 35th Parliament. Vol. I, 1994, p. 396

8. Canada to Review Cruise Missile Testing // DFAIT News Release, № 1, 03.02.1994

9. Ibidem

10. Ouellet Rules Out More Cruise Testing // The Globe and Mail, 14.05.1994

11. Sallot J. U.S. No Longer Needs Cruise Tests // The Globe and Mail, 17.05.1994

12. White Paper on Defence. – Ottawa: DND, 1994, p. 24

13. В 1951 г. вдоль 50° с.ш. была построена «Сосновая линия», в 1954 г. через 55° с.ш. – «Среднеканадская линия» и, наконец, в 1957 г. «Линия Дью» вдоль 70° с.ш. См.: The Guide to Canadian Politics on Arms Control, Disarmament, Defence and Conflict Resolution. – Ottawa: Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security, 1990, p. 155

14. Sokolsky J. The Future of North American Defence Co-operation // International Journal, Winter 1990-1991, p. 33

15. The Guide to Canadian Politics on Arms Control…p. 156

16. Приводится и другая цифра канадских расходов – 800 млн. долл. – в зависимости от того, включают ли в общую сумму затраты на строительство четырех северных баз с взлетно-посадочными полосами

17. White Paper on Defence. – Ottawa: DND, 1994, p. 23

18. McDonald M. Turning NORAD into Drug-Buster // The Toronto Star, 12.10.1993

19. A Brief History of NORAD. As of 31 December 2012. North American Defense Command. Office of History, p. 7

20. McDonald M. Turning NORAD into Drug-Buster // The Toronto Star, 12.10.1993

21. Цит. по: Future of NORAD in Doubt, Officials Say // The Toronto Star, 18.09.1990

22. A NORAD Refit for New Times (Editorial) // The Toronto Star, 05.11.1990

23. The NORAD Renewal Issue. Report of the Special Panel to the Sub-committee of the House of Commons Standing Committee on External Affairs and International Trade Considering the Question of Renewing in May 1991 the North American Aerospace Defence Agreement. – Ottawa: Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security. Working Paper № 33, March 1991, p. 57

24. Canada and United States to Renew NORAD Agreement // DFAIT News Release, № 96, 19.04.1991

25. Security in a Changing World. The Report of the Special Joint Committee on Canada’s Defence Policy. Ottawa, 1994, p. 15

26. Ibid., p. 35

27. Canada’s Foreign Policy: Principles and Priorities for the Future. Report of the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and the House of Commons Reviewing Canadian Foreign Policy. November 1994, p. 22

28. White Paper on Defence. – Ottawa: DND, 1994, p. 23

29. Ibidem

30. House of Commons. Standing Committee on National Defence and Veteran Affairs. Evidence. 03.10.1995. http://www.parl.gc.ca/35/Archives/committees351/defa/evidence/30_95-10-03/defa30_blk101.html

31. House of Commons. Standing Committee on National Defence and Veteran Affairs. Evidence. 03.10.1995. http://www.parl.gc.ca/35/Archives/committees351/defa/evidence/30_95-10-03/defa30_blk101.html

32. Ibidem

33. Ibidem

34. House of Commons Debates. Official Report (Hansard), Vol. 133, № 10, p. 495. http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/hoc/House/352/Debates/010/han010-e.pdf

35. Ibid., p. 497

36. Ibidem

37. Canadian Defence Policy. April 1992. – Ottawa: DND, p. 17

38. White Paper on Defence. – Ottawa: DND, 1994, p. 24

39. Ibidem

40. Goetz D. McDonald C. Bill S-25: An Act to Amend the Defence Production Act. 06.09.2000. LS-370E. Library of Parliament. http://www.parl.gc.ca/About/Parliament/LegislativeSummaries/bills_ls.asp?lang=E&ls=S25&Parl=36&Ses=2

41. Grover B. An Assessment of Proposed Changes to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations. 26.02.1999. Canadian Defence Industries Association. http://www.fas.org/asmp/campaigns/control/Canadianexemptionsfoia/P5EQ.pdf

42. Ibidem

43. Sallot J. Defence Industries Gain Reprieve // The Globe and Mail, 23.04.1999

44. Axworthy L. Navigating a New World: Canada’s Global Future. – Toronto: Vintage Canada, 2004, p. 105

45. Joint Statement on Defense Export Controls and North American Defense Industrial Base. 08.10.1999. http://www.fas.org/asmp/campaigns/control/Canadianexemptionsfoia/P3C.pdf

46. Canada and the United Sates Resolve Differences Over International Traffic in Arms Regulations // DFAIT News Release, № 222, 08.10.1999

47. Edgar A. Growth Pains or Growing Strains ? The Limits of Neighborliness and the Politicization of Canada-US Defence Industry Integration // Canadian Foreign Policy, Winter 2001, p. 11

48. McKenna B. U.S. Will Reinstate Technology Access for Canada // The Globe and Mail, 17.06.2000

49. PM Press Statement and Guidance: Joint United Sates-Canada Statement on Defense Export Controls. 19.06.2000. http://www.fas.org/asmp/campaigns/control/Canadianexemptionsfoia/P3O.pdf

50. Edgar A. Op. cit., p. 12

51. McKenna B. Security Concerns Threaten Special Status with U.S. // The Globe and Mail, 23.04.1999

52. Цит. по: McKenna B. Security Concerns Threaten…; Также см.: Canada Asked to Boost Defence // The Globe and Mail, 12.01.1999

53. См.: Jockel J., Sokolsky J. The End of the Canada-U.S. Defense Relationship. Policy Papers on Americas. Vol. VII, Study 2, 01.05.1996

54. Выдвинув впервые эту концепцию в начале 1970-х гг., Орвик в последующем развивал и дополнял ее. См.: Orvik N. Defence Against Help – A Strategy for Small States? // Survival, September-October 1973, pp. 228-231; Orvik N. The Basic Issue in Canadian National Security: Defence Against Help, Defence to Help Others // Canadian Defence Quarterly, Summer 1981 (перепечатана в том же журнале 9 лет спустя. См.: Canadian Defence Quarterly, August 1990, pp. 58-64); Orvik N. Canadian Security and “Defence Against Help” // Survival, Summer 1984, pp. 26-31

55. Orvik N. Defence Against Help – A Strategy for Small States? // Survival, September-October 1973, p. 228

56. См.: Sokolsky J. The Future of North American Defence Co-operation // International Journal, Winter 1990-1991, p. 547; Leyton-Brown D. Canadian Defence Policy in the 1990s: The North American Dimension // Canadian Defence Quarterly, August 1991, p. 21; Sokolsky J., Detomasi D. Canadian Defence Policy and the Future of Canada-United States Security Relations // The American Review of Canadian Studies, Winter 1994, p. 547

57. White Paper on Defence. – Ottawa: DND, 1994, p. 21

Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас