18.97.14.82
Some Comments to R. Aquila's Paper ‘Kantian Appearances, Intentional Gegenstände, and Some Varieties of Phenomenalism’
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
1606


Downloads
471
UDC
1 ФИЛОСОФИЯ. ПСИХОЛОГИЯ
Date of publication
06.07.2020
Public year
2020
DOI
10.18254/S271326680010286-5
Some Comments to R. Aquila's Paper ‘Kantian Appearances, Intentional Gegenstände, and Some Varieties of Phenomenalism’
Annotation

In my commentary, I write, firstly, of the dualistic (ambivalent) use of the concept ‘appearance’ by Kant and, secondly, of the need for a semantic (referential)  interpretation of the Kantian concept ‘‘appearance’ as opposed to intentional interpretation of R.Aquilla. In his reply to my objections, R. Aquila precisies his initial position and gives additional arguments in it’s favor.

About authors
Sergey Katrechko
GAUGN
Richard Aquila
University of Tennessee
References

1. Aquila R. Intentional Objects and Kantian Appearances //Philosophical Topics, Vol. 12, No. 2, Essays on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, 1981, pp. 9–37.

2. Katrechko S.L. Transcendentalizm Kanta kak realisticheskaja teorija opyta/poznanija (analiz struktury kantovskogo koperni-kanskogo perevorota), in: Filosofija i nauka: problemy sootnesenija. M.: RGGU, Kn.1, p.213–226; https://www.academia.edu/30347748/.

3. Katrechko S.L. Kantovskoe javlenie kak ob"ektivno–ob"ektnoe (predmetnoe) predstavlenie //Kantovskiiy sbornik, 2017, Tom 36, № 3, pp.7–20; https://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/3665/10177/.

4. Katrechko, S.L. Kant’s Appearance as an Objective–Objectual Representation, in: Con-Textos Kantianos (International Journal of Philosophy, №7, 2018, pp.44–59 (https://www.con-textoskantianos.net/index.php/revista/article/view/310).

5. Katrechko S.L. Priroda kantovskogo javlenija: semanticheskiiy analiz //Transcendental'nyiy povorot v sovremennoiy filosofii (3): priroda (specifika) transcendental'noiy filosofii. Sbornik tezisov mej`dunarodnogo nauchnogo seminara «Transcendental'nyiy povorot v sovremennoiy filosofii» (g. Moskva, 19–22 aprelja 2018 g.) / Otv. red. S.L. Katrechko. – Moskva: Fond CGI, GAUGN-Press, 2018, S.36–49 (https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35291720).

6. Katrechko S.L. Priroda javlenija v transcendentalizme Kanta: semantiko-kognitivnyiy analiz [The Nature of Appearance in Kant’s Transcendentalism: a Semantico–Cognitive Analysis] //Kantovskiiy sbornik (nauch-nyiy j`urnal), 2018, T.37, № 3. s.31–55 (https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36930196&).

7. Katrechko S.L. Specifika kantovskogo transcendentalizma i koncept «vesh'–sama–po–sebe» [Kant's transcendentalism and the thing in itself] //Kantovskiiy sbornik, 2017, T.36, №4, s.68–87 (https://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/3699/10222/).

8. Aquila R. Things in Themselves and Appearances: Intentionality and Reality, in: Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie. 1979. Vol. 61. pp. 293–308.

9. Aquila R. Representational Mind: A Study of Kant's Theory of Knowledge, Indiana University Press, 1983.

10. Aquila R. Hans Vaihinger and Some Recent Intentionalist Readings of Kant, Journal of the History of Philosophy. Vol. 41, № 2 (2003), pp.231–250.

11. Aquila R. The Transcendental Idealisms of Kant and Sartre, in: S. Baiasu (ed.). Comparing Kant and Sartre. 2016. pp. 217–255.

12. Aquila R. Cartesian Consciousness and the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories // Jahrbuch des deutschen Idealismus, 2013, pp.3–24 (in: International Yearbook of German Idealism, 11 (2013; published 2016).

13. Aquila R. Husserl and Frege on Meaning, in: Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol.12, Number 3, July 1974, pp. 377–383.

14. Allison H.E. Kant’s concept of the transcendental object, in: Kant-Studien 59 (1–4), 1968, pp.165–186.

15. Barker S.F. Appearing and appearances in Kant // The Monist. 1967. Vol. 51, №3, pp.426–441.

16. Cassirer E., Determinismus Und Indeterminismus in der Modernen Physik Historische Und Systematische Studien Zum Kausal-problem, 1937, p.165.

17. Frege G. ‘Uber Sinn und Bedeutung’, in Zeitschrift fur Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, pp.25–50.

18. Follesdal D. Brentano and Husserl on Intentional Objects and Perception, in: H. Dreyfus, ed., Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982), pp.31–41 (see also the articles on noema in this collection).

19. Follesdal D. Husserl's Notion of Noema, in: Journal of Philosophy (October 1969), v.66(20), pp.680–687 (see also: Follesdal D. Husserl und Frege: ein Beitrag zur Beleuchtung der Entstehung der phanomenologischen Philosophie. Avhandlinger utgitt av det Norske videnskaps-akademi i Oslo. 2:Hist.-filos. klasse, 1958, no. 2. Oslo: I kommisjon hos Aschehoug, 1958).

20. Kersey E.M. The Noema, Husserlian, and Beyond: An Annotated Bibliography of English Language Sources,” Philosophy Re-search Archives 9, 1983, pp. 62–90.

21. Robinson H. The Disappearing X, in: Proceedings of the 9th International Kant Congress, Berlin: De. Gruyter, 2001, vol. 2, pp. 418–428.

Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас