1. Kant I. Kants Gesammelte Schriften. Akademie Ausgabe. Berlin: Reimer, later de Gruyter, 1900ff.

2. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma // Kant I. Sochinenija na russkom i nemeckom jazykah. M.: Nauka, 1994 – 2006. T. 2. CH.1, CH.2.

3. Kant I. Izbrannye pis'ma // Kant I. Soch. v 8-mi tt. T.8. M.: CHoro, 1994. S.463–590.

4. Kant I. Prolegomeny ko vsjakoiy budusheiy metafizike, kotoraja moj`et pojavit'sja kak nauka // Kant I. Soch. v 8-mi tt. T.4, M.: CHoro, 1994, s.5–152.

5. Kant I. O forme i principah chuvstvenno vosprinimaemogo i intelligibel'nogo mira // Kant I. Soch. v 8-mi tt. T.2, M.: CHoro, 1994, s.277 – 320.

6. Kant I. Iz rukopisnogo nasledija (materialy k «Kritike chistogo razuma», Opus postumum), M.: Progress-tradicija, 2000.

7. Katrechko S.L. Transcendentalizm Kanta kak transcendental'naja paradigma filosofstvovanija //Kantovskiiy sbornik, 2014, №2 (48) s.10 – 25; http://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/1775/5059/).

8. Katrechko S.L. O kantovskoiy «idee transcendental'noiy filosofii» // Transcendental'nyiy povorot v sovremennoiy filosofii (3): priroda (specifika) transcendental'noiy filosofii. Sbornik tezisov mej`dunarodnogo nauchnogo seminara «Transcendental'nyiy povorot v sovremennoiy filosofii» / Otv. red. S.L. Katrechko. – Moskva: Fond CGI, GAUGN-Press, 2018, S.14–26; https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35291698.

9. Katrechko S.L. JAvljaetsja li kantovskiiy transcendentalizm idealizmom? //Transcendental'nyiy povorot v sovremennoiy filosofii (4): transcendental'naja metafizika, epistemologija i filosofija nauki, teologija i filosofija soz-nanija. Sbornik tezisov mej`dunarodnogo nauchnogo seminara «Transcendental'nyiy povorot v sovremennoiy filoso-fii». Moskva: Fond CGI, GAUGN-Press, 2019, S.47–52; https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39452806.

10. Katrechko S.L. Transcendental'nyiy analiz matematiki: konstruktivnyiy harakter matematicheskoiy dejatel'nosti // Kantovskiiy sbornik. 2016. T. 55. № 1. S. 16–33; https://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/3091/8702/.

11. Katrechko S.L. (red.) «Transcendental'nyiy povorot v sovremennoiy filosofii» (materialy mej`dunarodnyh konferenciiy, 2016 – 2019 gg.: (2016) https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29024766; (2017) https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30560011; (2018) https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35240888; (2019) https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41494716; (2020) https://www.academia.edu/42826929/.

12. Katrechko S.L. Priroda javlenija v transcendentalizme Kanta: semantiko-kognitivnyiy analiz // Kantovskiiy sbornik (nauchnyiy j`urnal), 2018, T.37, № 3. s.31–55; https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36930196&.

13. Lektorskiiy V.A. Kant, radikal'nyiy konstruktivizm i konstruktivnyiy realizm v epistemologii // Voprosy filosofii, 2005, №8. S.10–25.

14. Ogurcov A.P. Filosofija nauki: dvadcatyiy vek (v 3 tt.): Koncepcii i problemy (T.1): issledovatel'skie programmy. — SPb.: Izd. dom «Mir». S. 376–377.

15. Stroson P.F. Individy. Ocherk deskriptivnoiy metafiziki. Kaliningrad: Izd-vo RGU im. I.Kanta, 2009.

16. Frege G. Smysl i znachenie // Frege G. Izbrannye raboty. M.: Dom intellektual'noiy knigi, 1997. S. 25–49.

17. Fuko M. Porjadok diskursa // Fuko M. Volja k istine. M.: Kastal', 1996.

18. Hauell R. Kantovskie predmety: problemy i perspektivy issledovanija // Kantovskiiy sbornik. 2008. № 1. S. 6–21.

19. Adickes E. Kants Lehre von der doppelten Affektion unseres Ichs als Schlussel zu seiner Erkenntnistheorie, Verlag von J.C.B. Mohr: Tubingen, 1929.

20. Allais L. Manifest Reality: Kant's Idealism and his Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

21. Allison H. Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, Revised and Enlarged Edition, 2004.

22. Allison H. Transcendentalism Idealism: the 'Two Aspect' View, in: Bernard den Ouden (ed.) New Essays on Kant, New York: Peter Lang, 1987, p.155.

23. Ameriks R. Kant’s Idealism on a Moderate Interpretation, in: Schulting and Verburgt (eds), Kant’s Idealism: New Interpreta-tions of a Controversial Doctrine (Dordrecht: Springer, 2011), pp. 29–53.

24. Barker S.F. Appearing and appearances in Kant // The Monist. 1967. Vol. 51, № 3. R. 426–441.

25. Bird G. The Revolutionary Kant: A Commentary on the Critique of Pure Reason, Chicago and La Salle: Open Court, 2006 (sm. takj`e bolee rannjuju rabotu: Bird G. Kant’s Theory of Knowledge: An Outline of One Central Argument in the Critique of Pure Reason. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962).

26. Collingwood, R. G. [1940] An Essay on Metaphysics, revised edition with an introduction by Rex Martin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.

27. Forster E. Die 25 Jahre der Philosophie: Eine systematische Rekonstruktion. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann Rote Reihe, 2011 (sm. takj`e: Forster Eckart The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy (A Systematic Reconstruction) (trans. by B.Bowman), Har-vard, 2012).

28. Gideon A. Der Begriff Transscendental in Kant's Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Marburgh, 1903.

29. Hanna R. Kant in the twentieth century. In: D.Moran (Ed), Routledge Companion to Twentieth-Century Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2008, p.149–203.

30. Hoffe O. Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: the Foundation of Modern Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.

31. Katrechko S.L. Kant’s Appearance as an Objective–Objectual Representation, in: Con–Textos Kantianos (International Journal of Philosophy), №7, 2018, pp.44–59; https://www.con-textoskantianos.net/index.php/revista/article/view/310.

32. Katrechko S.L. Transcendentalism as the Special Type of Philosophizing and the Transcendental Paradigm of Philosophy, in: Natur und Freiheit. Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Im Auftrag der Kant-Gesellschaft herausgegeben von Vi-oletta L. Waibel, Margit Ruffing und David Wagner unter Mitwirkung von Sophie Gerber. 5 Bande. Berlin/Boston 2018. B.1, 1073–1082.

33. Langton R. Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 (2001).

34. Oberst M. Two Worlds and Two Aspects: on Kant’s Distinction between Things in Themselves and Appearances // Kantian Review. 2015. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 53–75.

35. Piche C. Kant and the problem of affection, in; Symposium (Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy), v.8, № 2, 2004, p. 275–297.

36. Pereboom D. Kant's Transcendental Arguments (SEP): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-transcendental/.

37. Rockmore T. In Kant's Wake: Philosophy in the Twentieth Century. London: Wiley Blackwell, 2006.

38. Rockmore T. Kant and Idealism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.

39. Sacks M. Naturalism and the Transcendental Turn, in: Ratio, v.19, 2006, pp.92–106.

40. Sellars, W. Science and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes, Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd; London, and The Hu-manities Press; New York, 1968.

41. Stern, R. (ed.) Transcendental arguments: problems and prospects, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

42. Stern R. Transcendental Arguments (SEP): https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/transcendental-arguments/.

43. Stapleford S. Kant's Transcendental Arguments: Disciplining Pure Reason, Continuum Publishing, 2008.

44. Strawson, P.F. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, London and New York: Routledge, 1966.

45. Trendelenburg A.F. Ueber eine Lucke in Kants Beweis von der ausschliessenden Subjectivetat des Raums und der Zeit. Ein kritisches und antikritisches Blatt // Historische Beitrage zur Philosophie. Band 3. Berlin: Verlag von G. Bethge, 1867. S. 215–276.

46. Vaihinger N. Commentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 2 vols., Stuttgart, Berlin, Leipzig: Union Deutsche Verlagsge-sellschaft, 1892, v. 2.