18.97.14.82
"Kantian Appearances, Intentional Gegenstände, and Some Varieties Phenomenalism" (Translation: M. Evstigneev, G. Filatov)
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
1764


Downloads
377
UDC
1 ФИЛОСОФИЯ. ПСИХОЛОГИЯ
Date of publication
06.07.2020
Public year
2020
DOI
10.18254/S271326680008407-8
"Kantian Appearances, Intentional Gegenstände, and Some Varieties Phenomenalism" (Translation: M. Evstigneev, G. Filatov)
Annotation

The aim is to develop some new alternatives for a phenomenalistic reading of Kant. Although the concern is ultimately with empirically real objects, I begin with a reading of the Aesthetic and the notion of appearances as at least possibly of empirically real objects. Employing Husserlian terminology, I take these to be the “noematic correlate” of a fundamental mode of directedness borne by an (at least initially) purely aesthetic “noesis”. From here, and with a new reading of Kant's discussion of the “transcendental object = X ”, new possibilities open for a sense in which even a phenomenalistic Kant might - without regarding them as also existing in themselves - regard empirically real objects as more than mere “logical constructs” out of the Aesthetic's “appearances”.

About authors
Richard Aquila
University of Tennessee
References

1. Kant I. Prolegomeny ko vsyakoj buduyuschej metafizike, kotoraya mozhet poyavit'sya kak nauka // Sochineniya. V 8-mi t. T.4. Moskva: Choro, 1994a. S. 5–152. 95

2. Kant I. Izbrannye pis'ma // Sochineniya. V 8-mi t. T.8. Moskva: Choro, 1994b. S. 463–589. 96

3. Kant I. Iz rukopisnogo naslediya (materialy k «Kritike chistogo razuma», Opus postumum) / per. s nem. V.A. Zhuchkov, V.V. Vasil'ev, S.A. Chernov. Moskva: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000. 97

4. Kant I. T.2: Kritika chistogo razuma: v 2ch. Ch.1 // Sochineniya na nemetskom i russkom yazykakh / pod red. B. Bushling, N. Motroshilova. Moskva: Nauka, 2006a. 98

5. Kant I. T.2: Kritika chistogo razuma: v 2ch. Ch.2 // Sochineniya na nemetskom i russkom yazykakh / pod red. N. Motroshilova, B. Bushling. Moskva: Nauka, 2006b. 99

6. Aquila R.E. Is sensation the matter of appearances // Interpreting Kant / ed. M.S. Gram. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1982. S. 11–29. 100

7. Aquila R.E. Matter in Mind: A Study of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction // Philos. Phenomenol. Res. 1989. T. 51. № 4. S. 929–934. 101

8. Aquila R.E. Hans Vaihinger and Some Recent Intentionalist Readings of Kant // J. Hist. Philos. 2003. T. 41. № 2. S. 231–250. 102

9. Aquila R.E. Cartesian Consciousness and the Transcendental Deductionofthe Categories // Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus: Bewusstsein / eds. D. Emundts, S. Sedwick. Berlin: DE GRUYTER, 2013. 103

10. Aquila R.E. The Transcendental Idealisms of Kant and Sartre // Comparing Kant and Sartre / ed. S. Baiasu. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. S. 217–256. 104

11. Howell R. Kant, the I Think, and Self-Awareness // Kant’s Legacy. Essays in Honor of Lewis White BeckUniv / ed. P. Ciovacki. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2000. S. 117–152. 105

12. Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason / eds. P. Guyer, A. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 106

13. Kant I. Notes and Fragments / eds. P. Guyer, C. Bowman, F. Rauscher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 107

14. Sellars W. Science and metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968.

Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас