Catalog
English
Catalog
Везде
  
18.97.9.173
From “methodological essentialism” to totalitarianism: unfinished dispute Karl Popper with Platon Ethics and politics of Platon
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
2103


Downloads
99
Educational programs
Теория и история права и государства,  Конституционное право,  Гражданское право предпринимательское право семейное право,  Финансовое право,  Трудовое право,  Земельное право,  Корпоративное право,  Уголовное право и криминология,  Уголовный процесс,  Международное право,  Судебная деятельность, прокурорская деятельность, правозащитная и правоохранительная деятельность,  Криминалистика,  Информационное право,  Административное право,  Гражданский процесс арбитражный процесс
UDC
34 Право. Юридические науки
Publisher
Russian Academy of Sciences
Date of publication
18.12.2020
Public year
2020
DOI
10.31857/S102694520012729-2
From “methodological essentialism” to totalitarianism: unfinished dispute Karl Popper with Platon Ethics and politics of Platon
Read
Cite
Annotation

The article represents a reply to PhD in Law A.V. Stovba’s critical analysis published in “Pravovedenie”. The author has defended the thesis that there is doubt as to whether the application of new terminology and innovative research methods borrowed from Hard Sciences and Philosophy and propagated by the representatives of the so called Non-classical Philosophy of law has brought positive results in jurisprudence.

Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2020 Issue 12
Source
About authors
Orest Martyshin
Kutafin Moscow state law University (MSLA)
References

1. Mamardashvili M.K., Solovyov E. Yu., Shvyrev V.S. Classical and modern bourgeois philosophy (Experience of epistemological comparison) // Questions of philosophy. 1970. No. 12; 1971. No. 4 (in Russ.).

2. Non-classical Philosophy of Law: questions and answers. Kharkov, 2013. P. 111, 128, 130, 131, 133, 135, 153 - 155, 157, 169, 172, 253, 256 (in Russ.).

3. Pozner R.A. Frontiers of the theory of law. M., 2017. P. 158 (in Russ.).

4. Sokal N., Brikmon Zh. Intellectual tricks. Critique of modern postmodern philosophy. M., 2002. P. 154, 124 (in Russ.).

5. Stovba A.V. On the features of philosophical and legal methodology // Jurisprudence. 2017. No. 4. P. 91 - 98, 100 (in Russ.).

6. Timoshina E.V. Classical and post-classical legal understanding as styles of philosophical and legal thinking // Anthology of post-classical law / under the General editorship of I.L. Chestnov. SPb., 2016. 221, 234, 235, 284, 291, 292 (in Russ.).

7. Khokhlov E.B. Legal chimeras as a problem of modern Russian legal science // Jurisprudence. 2004. No. 1. P. 5, 6 (in Russ.).

Similar
From the History of Soviet Ancient History: Classical Studies in Samara in 1917—1922
Markelov A.
TIME PERSPECTIVE IN EXTREME SITUATION
kvasova o.
On subject`s specificity of the non-classic Philosophy of Law: continuing of the dialogue
Stovba A.
Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас
На месяц
490 Р / Month
На полугодие
390 Р / Month
2,340 Р за 6 месяцев
На год
290 Р / Month
3,480 Р за год