1. Голицын В.В. (1990) Международно-правовой режим Антарктики. Автореферат диссертации на соискание уч. степени д.ю.н. М.: Дипакадемия МИД СССР. 31 С.

2. Лабуть Д.А. (2018) К вопросу об установлении границ континентального шельфа в Антарктике: позиции государств и практика комиссии по границам континентального шельфа // Международное право и международные организации. №3. С. 27–39. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0633.2018.3.27041

3. Лукин В.В. (2006) Зачем России Антарктида? // Наука и жизнь. №10. (https://www.nkj.ru/archive/articles/7593/).

4. Лукин В.В. (2017) Предпосылки создания и современная роль Мадридского протокола в Системе Договора об Антарктике // Проблемы Арктики и Антарктики. 2017. №2. С. 96–112.

5. Beck P.J. (2006) The United Nations and Antarctica, 2005: the End of the “Question of Antarctica”? // Polar Record. Vol. 42. Issue 3. P. 217-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S003224740600533X.

6. Comba D. (2009) The Polar Continental Shelf Challenge: Claims and Exploitation of Mineral Sea Resources – An Antarctic and Arctic Comparative Analysis // Yearbook of International Environmental Law. Vol. 20. Issue 1. P. 158–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/yiel/20.1.158.

7. Dodds K. (2010) Governing Antarctica: Contemporary Challenges and the Enduring Legacy of the 1959 Antarctic Treaty // Global Policy. 2010. Vol. 1. Issue 1. P. 108–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2009.00006.x.

8. Oude Elferink A. G. (2009) The Continental Shelf in the Polar Regions: Cold War or Black-Letter Law? // Netherlands Yearbook of International Law. Vol. 40. Р. 121–181. DOI:10.1017/S0167676809000038.

9. Green Julia. (2001) Australian maritime boundaries: the Australian Antarctic Territory // Marine Policy. Vol. 25(1), Р. 1–11.

10. Hamzah B.A. (2010) Malaysia and the Southern Ocean: Revisiting the Question of Antarctica // Ocean Development and International Law. Vol. 41. Issue 2. P. 186–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00908321003733147.

11. Jayaseelan S. (2019) Development of Malaysia’s Position in Antarctica: 1983 to 2017 // The Polar Journal. Vol. 9. Issue 1. Pp. 214–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2019.1618551.

12. Kaye S. B., Rothwell D. R. (2002) Southern Ocean Boundaries and Maritime Claims: Another Antarctic Challenge for the Law of the Sea? // Ocean Development & International Law. Vol. 33. Issue 3-4. Р. 359–389. DOI: 10.1080/00908320290054828

13. Lefeber R. (1990) The Exercise of Jurisdiction in the Antarctic Region and the Changing Structure of International Law: The International Community and Common Interests // Netherlands Yearbook of International Law. № 21. Р. 81–137. DOI: doi:10.1017/S0167676800002075.

14. Rothwell D.R. (2000) Polar environmental protection and international law: the 1991 Antarctic Protocol // European Journal of International Law. Volume 11. Issue 3. Р. 591–614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/11.3.591.

15. Scott K. (2009) Managing Sovereignty and Jurisdiction Disputes in the Antarctic: the Next Fifty Years // Yearbook of International Environmental Law. Vol. 20. Issue 1. P. 3–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/yiel/20.1.3

16. Scott S. V. (2013) The Evolving Antarctic Treaty System: Implications of Accommodating Developments in the Law of the Sea // in: The Law of the Sea and the Polar Regions. Ed. Erik J. Molenaar, Alex G. Oude Elferink, and Donald R. Rothwell. Martinus Nijhoff. P. 17–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004255210_003.

17. Triggs G. (1987) The Antarctic Treaty system: Some Jurisdictional Problems. In G. Triggs (Ed.), The Antarctic Treaty Regime: Law, Environment and Resources (Studies in Polar Research). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 88–110. DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511565502.011.

18. Vidas D. (2000) Emerging Law of the Sea Issues in the Antarctic Maritime Area: A Heritage for the New Century? // Ocean Development & International Law. Vol. 31. Issue 1-2. P. 197–222. DOI: 10.1080/009083200276120.