Integral-institutional paradigm and the Russian way: overcoming the defects of the concepts of Power–Property  and X-Y matrices

Bessonova, Olga

18.97.14.85

Home/Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. 2018 Issue 4/Integral-institutional paradigm and the Russian way: overcoming the defects of the concepts of "Power–Property" and "X-Y matrices"

Integral-institutional paradigm and the Russian way: overcoming the defects of the concepts of "Power–Property" and "X-Y matrices"

Read

Download pdf

Add to favorite

Cite

Reviews

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Views

1932

Downloads

Educational programs

Экономическая теория, Экономика и управление народным хозяйством, Мировая экономика, Теория и философия политики, история и методология, Политические институты, процессы и технологии, Политическая культура и идеологии, Политические проблемы международных отношений, глобального и регионального развития, Политическая регионалистика. Этнополитика

UDC

3 ОБЩЕСТВЕННЫЕ НАУКИ

Publisher

Russian Academy of Sciences

Date of publication

08.10.2018

Public year

2018

DOI

10.31857/S086904990000616-9

Integral-institutional paradigm and the Russian way: overcoming the defects of the concepts of "Power–Property" and "X-Y matrices"

Read

Add to favorite

Cite

Annotation

The article presents the results of the integral-institutional paradigm, which is a new tool for analyzing institutional evolution and the historical path of Russian society. In this paradigm, the market and razdatok (non-market economies) are viewed both as universal development mechanisms and as "equal hands" of the state. The confrontation between market and razdatok economies is replaced in the 21st century synthesis of market institutions and razdatok. Inclusive synthesis in the form of contractual razdatok gives rise to a new institutional matrix of the social state and democracy for the economies, both with the market and with the razdatok prior development. This is the key difference of the new paradigm from the concepts of "power-property" and "X-Y matrices", which are based on antagonistic dichotomies and pre-set results.

Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. 2018 Issue 4

Source

https://ons-journal.ru/s0869-04990000001-4-1/

About authors

Olga Bessonova

References

1. Avstrijskaya shkola v politicheskoj ehkonomii (1992) M.: Ehkonomika.

2. Adzhemoglu D., Robinson D. (2015) Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. Proiskhozhdenie vlasti, protsvetaniya i nischety. M.:ACT.

3. Bessonova O.Eh. (2006) Obschaya teoriya institutsional'nykh transformatsij kak novaya kartina mira // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. № 2. S. 130–142.

4. Bessonova O.Eh. (2015) Rynok i razdatok v rossijskoj matritse: ot konfrontatsii k integratsii. M.: ROSSPEhN.

5. Bessonova O.Eh. (2007) Fenomen teorii institutsional'nykh matrits: restavratsiya ustarevshej paradigmy // Ehkonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoj Rossii. № 2. S. 23–33.

6. Blok F. (2004) Roli gosudarstva v khozyajstve // Ehkonomicheskaya sotsiologiya. № 2 (5). S. 37–56 (ecsoc.hse.ru).

7. Kirdina S.G. (2000) Institutsional'nye matritsy i razvitie Rossii, M.: TEIS.

8. Klark D. (2011) Za ramkami gosudarstvennogo i chastnogo? Transformatsiya smeshannoj modeli blagosostoyaniya // Zhurnal issledovanij sotsial'noj politiki. № 9. S. 151–168.

9. Kolganov A. (2017) K kritike kontseptsii "vlasti-sobstvennosti" // Voprosy ehkonomiki. № 7. S. 79–95.

10. Kun T. (2001) Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsij. M.: AST.

11. Nort D., Uollis D., Vajngast B. (2011) Nasilie i sotsial'nye poryadki. Kontseptual'nye ramki dlya interpretatsii pis'mennoj istorii chelovechestva. M.: Izdatel'stvo Instituta Gajdara.

12. Nureev R. M. (2009) Rossiya: varianty institutsional'nogo razvitiya. M.: Norma.

13. Pliskevich N.M. (2015) Transformatsiya sistemy vlasti-sobstvennosti v Rossii: regional'nyj aspekt. Mogut li regiony nachat' svoj put' k modernizatsii? // Mir Rossii. № 2. S. 89–104.

14. Chernysh M. F. (2015) Teoriya institutsional'nykh matrits: kriticheskij analiz // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 10. S. 74–83.

15. Hayden G. F. (2017) An Evaluation of Institutional Matrices Theory Which Was Designed to Illustrate Differences Between Russian and Western Political Economies // Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 5. No. 2. Pp. 467–475 (http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2017.1321404).

16. Klimina A. (2016) The Role of Culture, Historicity, and Human Agency in the Evolution of the State: A Case against Culture of Fatalism // Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 50. No. 2. Pp. 557–565 (https://doi.org/10. 1080/00213624.2016. 1179064).

17. Quasi-Markets and Social Policy. (1993) Ed. by Grand J.L. and W. Bartlett. London: Palgrave Macmillan (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22873-7).

Similar

THE INSTITUTIONAL CRISIS AND EVOLUTIONARY POSSIBILITIES OF ITS OVERCOMING

Bessonova O.

Полная версия доступна только подписчикам

Подпишитесь прямо сейчас

GOST	Bessonova O. Integral-institutional paradigm and the Russian way: overcoming the defects of the concepts of "Power–Property" and "X-Y matrices" // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. – 2018. – Issue 4 C. 129-144 . URL: https://ons-journal.ru/s0869-04990000001-4-1/. DOI: 10.31857/S086904990000616-9
MLA	Bessonova, Olga "Integral-institutional paradigm and the Russian way: overcoming the defects of the concepts of "Power–Property" and "X-Y matrices"." Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. 4 (2018).:129-144. DOI: 10.31857/S086904990000616-9
APA	Bessonova O. (2018). Integral-institutional paradigm and the Russian way: overcoming the defects of the concepts of "Power–Property" and "X-Y matrices". Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. no. 4, pp.129-144 DOI: 10.31857/S086904990000616-9

Catalog

Subscription

Help

Partnership