Least upper bound of percent good factors of used machinery items
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
1073


Downloads
16
Date of publication
16.12.2020
Public year
2020
DOI
10.31857/S042473880012431-3
Least upper bound of percent good factors of used machinery items
Read   Download pdf
About

We consider one of the problems of valuation of used machinery items. During operation, the technical and economic characteristics of the machinery item tend to deteriorate and the probability of its catastrophic (resource) failure changes. Accordingly, the market value of a used machinery item is reduced compared to a similar new one. The ratio of the market value of a used machinery item and a similar new one, expressed in a percentage (or as fractions of a unit) is called the percent good factor (goodness factor). In general, it depends on the technical condition of the machinery item. However, it is difficult to quantify and reliably estimate it in many cases (for example, in mass assessment), and appraisers are forced to rely only on the machine’s age. There are numerous articles containing recommended by the authors dependencies of goodness factors (or their additions to one, namely physical depreciation factors) on age. We present a model of the dependence of the machine’s market value on age, which allows us to establish the exact upper limit for its goodness factors. We show that a number of recommended dependencies do not satisfy the obtained restriction and therefore can lead to erroneous results.

About authors
Sergey Smolyak
Principal Science Researcher
CEMI RAS
References

1. Ковалев А.П., Кушель А.А., Хомяков В.С. и др. (2003). Оценка стоимости машин, оборудования и транспортных средств. М.: Интерреклама. [Kovalev A.P., Kushel' A.A., Khomjakov V.S. et al. (2003). Machinery, equipment and vehicles valuation. Moscow: Interreclama (in Russian).]

2. Лейфер Л.А. (2007). Доходный подход при оценке недвижимости. Типизация моделей прогнозируемых денежных потоков // Вопросы оценки. №3. С. 19–28. [Leifer L.A. (2007). Income approach to real estate appraisal. Typification of forecast cash flow models. Voprosy otsenki, 3, 19–28 (in Russian).]

3. Лейфер Л.А. (ред.). (2019). Справочник оценщика машин и оборудования. Корректирующие коэффициенты и характеристики рынка машин и оборудования. Нижний Новгород: Приволжский центр методического и информационного обеспечения оценки. [Leifer L.A. (ed.). (2019). Handbook of machinery and equipment appraiser. Correction factors and characteristics of the machinery and equipment market. Nizhny Novgorod: Volga Center for Methodological and Information Support of Valuation (in Russian).]

4. Смоляк С.А. (2016). Стоимостная оценка машин и оборудования (секреты метода ДДП). М.: Издательский дом «Опцион». [Smolyak S.A. (2016). Valuation of machinery and equipment (secrets of the DCF method). Moscow: Publishing House "Option" (in Russian).]

5. Трифонов М.Ю. (2013). Метод описания ускоренного износа объектов оценки // Вопросы оценки. № 03 (73). С. 39–41. [Trifonov M.Yu. (2013). Method for describing accelerated depreciation of valuation objects. Voprosy otsenki, 3, 39–41 (in Russian).]

6. Федотова М.А. (ред.). (2018). Оценка машин и оборудования: учебник. 2-е изд. М.: ИНФРА-М. [Fedotova M.А. (ed.). (2018). Machinery and equipment valuation: Textbook. 2th ed. Moscow: INFRA-M (in Russian).]

7. Цуканов В.Н. (2013). Модифицированный метод срока жизни для оценки физического износа при массовой оценке // Вопросы оценки. № 3. С. 42–43. [Tsukanov V.N. (2013). Modified lifetime method for estimating physical depreciation in mass assessment. Voprosy otsenki, 3, 42–43 (in Russian).]

8. 2019 Cost Index & Depreciation Schedules (2019). Raleigh: North Carolina Department of Revenue.

9. Personal property depreciation schedules and trend tables 2019 (2019). Helena: Montana Department of Revenue.

10. Patry A. (2007). Economic depreciation and retirement of Canadian assets: A comprehensive empirical study. Ottawa: Minister of Industry.