What micro-diachronic analysis can tell us about unmarked indefinites: Evidence from Russian [Неопределенные местоимения без маркера неопределенности через призму микродиахронического анализа: данные русского языка]
Отзывы
Оценка читателей
0.0 (0 голосов)


Всего просмотров
651


Скачивания
88
Образовательные программы
УДК
80 Общие вопросы лингвистики, литературы и филологии
Дата выпуска
30.01.2023
Год выпуска
2014
ISBN
0373-658X
DOI
10.31857/0373-658X.2023.1.19-53
What micro-diachronic analysis can tell us about unmarked indefinites: Evidence from Russian [Неопределенные местоимения без маркера неопределенности через призму микродиахронического анализа: данные русского языка]
Аннотация

 The paper deals with the evolution of Russian unmarked indefi nite pronouns, also known as bare interrogatives, since the 18ᵗʰ century. The Russian National Corpus data suggest that the distribution of unmarked indefinites both in modern Russian and in the Russian language of the 18ᵗʰ–19ᵗʰ centuries is not in line with previous proposals. Surprisingly, unmarked indefinites are more frequent in some specific contexts compared to non-specific contexts such as imperatives or subjunctive clauses. I argue that the distribution of Russian unmarked indefi nites can be accounted for by some sort of economy principle: due to the lack of a marker of indefiniteness, unmarked indefinites tend to be used in contexts that are strongly biased toward a certain interpretation of an indefinite in terms of specificity (specific known vs. specific unknown vs. non-specific). This analysis, as I suggest, correctly predicts two typological tendencies reported on unmarked indefinites in the literature.

Об авторах
Пекелис Ольга Евгеньевна
Российский государственный гуманитарный университет
Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас