Catalog
English
Catalog
Везде
  
18.97.9.171
Conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement: criminal procedural and forensic problems
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
3035


Downloads
133
Educational programs
Теория и история права и государства,  Конституционное право,  Гражданское право предпринимательское право семейное право,  Финансовое право,  Трудовое право,  Земельное право,  Корпоративное право,  Уголовное право и криминология,  Уголовный процесс,  Международное право,  Судебная деятельность, прокурорская деятельность, правозащитная и правоохранительная деятельность,  Криминалистика,  Информационное право,  Административное право,  Гражданский процесс арбитражный процесс
UDC
34 Право. Юридические науки
Publisher
Russian Academy of Sciences
Date of publication
27.02.2019
Public year
2019
DOI
10.31857/S013207690003852-9
Conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement: criminal procedural and forensic problems
Read
Cite
Annotation

The Institute of pre-trial agreement has been actively used in the practice of law enforcement agencies of Russia since 2009, but there are still many problems with its use. The pre-trial agreement cannot be applied everywhere in all crimes without exception, but only in the detection and investigation of its organized and most dangerous forms. The initiative to apply the pre-trial agreement should belong to law enforcement agencies, i.e. the investigator and the Prosecutor. The essence of the pre-trial agreement between the offender and the prosecution should be based on mutual contractual obligations, which should be clearly spelled out in the text of the agreement with a guarantee of their execution, especially by the state. This, in turn, requires that the pre-trial agreement be approved in court with the participation of interested parties to the criminal process. The decision of the sentence by the court in a special order under the pre-trial agreement shall be after consideration by the court of the main criminal case in the General order. 

Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2019 Issue 2
Source
About authors
Aslyam Khalikov
Institute of Law of the Bashkir State University
References

1. Abshilava G.V. Kombinatorika ugolovno-processual'nyh form pri realizacii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. ¹ 3. S. 73 ? 75.

2. Aleksandrov A. Podhod k preodoleniyu protivorechiya v zakone, reglamentiruyushchego zaklyuchenie i realizaciyu dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve po ugolovnomu delu // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2011. ¹ 1. S. 54 ? 57.

3. Baev M.O., Baev O. Ya. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve: sredi mifov i rifov // SPS “Konsul'tantPlyus”. 2010.

4. Bol'shoj tolkovyj slovar' russkogo yazyka. SPb., 1998. S. 1228.

5. Vinnickij L.V., Kubrikova M.E. Aktual'nye voprosy instituta dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve. M., 2015. S. 62 ? 64.

6. Golovizin M.V. Osobyj poryadok prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve: avtoref dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2012. S. 15.

7. Grichanichenko A. Osobyj poryadok prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya: sravnitel'nyj analiz soderzhaniya glavy 40 i glavy 40-1 UPK RF, problemy primeneniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. ¹ 1. S. 81 ? 85.

8. Davletov A.A. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo Rossijskoj Federacii: kurs lekcij. Ekaterinburg, 2013. S. 265.

9. Dudina N.A. K voprosu o prednaznachenii instituta dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Ross. sud'ya. 2014. ¹ 4. S. 8 ? 10.

10. Kasatkina S.A. Priznanie obvinyaemogo. M., 2010. S. 199, 200.

11. Kommentarij k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii / pod obshch. red. Yu.I. Skuratova i V.M. Lebedeva. M., 1999. S. 126.

12. Konin V.V. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve: nekotorye kriticheskie zamechaniya // Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve (pravovye i kriminalisticheskie problemy): materialy nauch.-prakt. konf. Vyp. 6 / otv. red. O.Ya. Baev. Voronezh, 2010. S. 166.

13. Kubrikova M.E. Aktual'nye voprosy instituta dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Chelyabinsk, 2013. S. 6, 7.

14. Mal'ko A.V. Stimuly i ogranicheniya v prave. M., 2004. S. 227.

15. Maslova Yu. A. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve na fone bespristrastnogo suda // Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve (pravovye i kriminalisticheskie problemy): materialy nauch.-prakt. konf. Vyp. 6 / otv. red. O.Ya. Baev. Voronezh, 2010. S. 188.

16. Ozhegov S.I., Shvedova N. Yu. Tolkovyj slovar' russkogo yazyka. M., 2003. S. 742.

17. Tertyshnaya O.A. Ugolovno-processual'nyj mekhanizm dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Voronezh. 2014. S. 118 ? 125.

18. Timoshenko A. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve: ocenka effektivnosti processual'nogo instituta // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2011. ¹ 4. S. 110.

19. Tishin R.V. Realizaciya konstitucionnogo principa “pravosudie v Rossijskoj Federacii osushchestvlyaetsya tol'ko sudom” v “polozheniyah dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve” // Mirovoj sud'ya. 2010. ¹ 11. S. 4 ? 7.

20. Tkachev I., Tisen O. Sravnitel'nyj analiz pravovoj reglamentacii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve i osobogo poryadka sudebnogo razbiratel'stva v rossijskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2011. ¹ 1. S. 83.

21. Haliullin A., Bulanov N., Konyarova Zh. Polnomochiya prokurora po zaklyucheniyu dosudebnogo soglasheniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. ¹ 3. S. 98 ? 102.

22. Shatalov A.S. Zaklyuchenie dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve: pravovaya reglamentaciya, dostoinstva i nedostatki // Zhurnal ross. prava. 2010. ¹ 5. S. 36.

Similar
Alternatives to prosecution in the French criminal procedure
Belozerova I., Astakhova D.
Prosecutor of the criminal process
Zazhiczkij V.
The Prosecutor’s Office and the Rule of Law during the Civil War
Zvyagintsev A.
The Prosecutor’s Office and the Rule of Law during the Civil War (The end)
Zvyagintsev A.
Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас
На месяц
490 Р / Month
На полугодие
390 Р / Month
2,340 Р за 6 месяцев
На год
290 Р / Month
3,480 Р за год