18.97.14.82
Empirical questions of formalization of historical information (the experience of compiling an Event Database on the history of Byzantium in the 9th–10th centuries)
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
820


Downloads
131
Date of publication
16.10.2021
Public year
2021
DOI
10.31696/S000000000016725-7
Empirical questions of formalization of historical information (the experience of compiling an Event Database on the history of Byzantium in the 9th–10th centuries)
Annotation

The article presents some of the main problems faced by the author and his colleagues at the preliminary stage of the implementation of the project of the event database of Byzantine history. The creation of a structured database containing the main events of the history of Byzantium in the 9th–10th centuries required preliminary work on the formation of a list of sources, collection and classification of scientific research literature, which resulted in the creation of special bibliographic databases. At the stage of direct creation of the event database, several fundamental theoretical problems had to be solved: on the relationship between fact and event; about the ways of fixing the event; on the methods and formats for specifying the date and place; on the essence, nature and form of recording events of various types. A need emerged to create a number of related databases: prosopographic, institutional, and geographic. These and other problems, solutions to which were proposed and implemented in the course of work on the Event Database, are set out taking into account the promising research prospects of this methodological approach for historical study.

About authors
Pavel Kuzenkov
Leading Researcher, Institute of Social Sciences and International Relations
Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Social Sciences and International Relations, Sevastopol State University
References

1. Kovalchenko, I. D. Methods of historical research. Moscow: Nauka, 1987 (in Russian)

2. Schoene, A. (ed.). Eusebi Chronicorum canonum quae supersunt. Berlin: Weidmann, 1866–1875. 2 vols.

3. Bystritskiy, N. I., Kuzenkov, P. V. “Suggested Approaches to the Acquisition and Analysis of Data for the Byzantine History.” Vizantiyskiy Vremennik 103. 2019. Pp. 13–31 (in Russian).

4. Regesten der Kaiserurkunden des oströmischen Reiches. Bd. 1/1. München, 2009 (2. Aufl.); Bd. 1/2. München, 2003 (2. Aufl.); Bd. 2. München, 1995 (2. Aufl.); Bd. 3. München, 1977 (2. Aufl.); Bd. 4. München, 1960; Bd. 5. München, 1965.

5. Lounghis, T. C. Regesten der Kaiserurkunden des oströmischen Reiches von 476 bis 565. Nicosia, 2005.

6. Les regestes des actes du Patriarcat de Constantinople, I: Les actes des Patriarches. T. 1. Paris, 1972 (2 éd.); T. 2–3. Paris, 1989 (2 éd.); T. 4. Paris, 1971; T. 5. Paris, 1977; T. 6. Paris, 1979; T. 7. Paris, 1991.

7. Archives de l’Athos. T. 1–21. Paris, 1935–2001.

8. Karayannopulos, J., Weiss, G. Quellenkunde zur Geschichte von Byzanz (324–1453). Wiesbaden, 1982.

9. Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae. Washington; Wien; Roma; Paris; Athens etc. 1967–.

10. Belfast Byzantine Texts and Translations. Belfast, 1991–.

11. Translated Texts for Byzantinists. Liverpool, 2012–.

12. Византийская библиотека. Источники. СПб.: Алетейя.

13. Thesaurus Linguae Graecae. A Digital Library of Greek Literature. http://stephanus.tlg.uci.edu/ (accessed on 20.08.21).

14. Bystritskiy, N. I. “Digital Bibliographical Resources for Byzantine Studies.” In Role of Bibliography in Information Support of Historical Science. Moscow, 2018. Pp. 399–411 (in Russian).

15. Prosopography of the Byzantine World. https://pbw2016.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/ (accessed on 20.08.21).

16. Prosopography of the Byzantine Empire. http://www.pbe.kcl.ac.uk/ (accessed on 20.08.21).

17. Prosopographie der mittelbyzantinischen Zeit. http://pom.bbaw.de/pmbz/ (accessed on 20.08.21).

18. Prosopographisches Lexikon der Palaiologenzeit. http://austriaca.at/3310-3inhalt (accessed on 20.08.21).

19. Prosopographie chrétienne du Bas-Empire. https://www.orient-mediterranee.com/spip.php?article1360&lang=fr (accessed on 20.08.21).

20. Tabula Imperii Byzantini. https://tib.oeaw.ac.at/ (accessed on 20.08.21).

21. Bystritskiy, N. “System approach for digital history.” ITM Web of Conferences 33. 2020. Vol. 33. Pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1051/itmconf/20203303002

22. Arutyunova, N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znacheniy: Otsenka. Sobytiye. Fakt. (Types of linguistic values: Assessment. Event. Fact). Moscow: Nauka, 1988. 341 pp. (In Russian).

23. Eremenko, A. M. “Ponyatiya «fakt» i «sobytiye»: smyslovoye skhodstvo i razlichiye. (“The concepts of «fact» and «event»: semantic similarity and difference.” Filosofski doslidzhennia 14. 2011. Pp. 246–254 (in Russian).

24. Bystritskiy, N. I. “Natural Science Approaches to the Acquisition and Analysis of Digital Data for the Byzantine History.” In Natural Science Methods in the Digital Humatitarian Envieronment. Perm, 2018. P. 19–22 (in Russian)

25. Islamic-Western Calendar Converter. Based on the Arithmetical or Tabular Calendar http://webspace.science.uu.nl/~gent0113/islam/islam_tabcal.htm (accessed on 20.08.21).

26. Kuzenkov, P. V. “Oleg’s Rus’ at Constantinople in 904.” Black Sea Region in the Middle Ages 8. 2011. Pp. 7–35 (in Riussian).

27. Kuzenkov, P. V. “Date of Princess Olga’s visit to Constantinople in the light of new data: 946.” Vizantiyskiy Vremennik 104. 2020. Pp. 127–149 (in Riussian).

28. Kuzenkov, P. V. “The campaign of Caliph al-Mutasim to Amorium in 838: clarification of chronology.” Antichnaya drevnost’ i srednie veka 48. 2020. Pp. 74–95 (in Riussian). DOI: 10.15826/adsv.2020.48.005

29. Bystritsky, N. I., Kuzenkov, P. V. “Experience of formalizing historical data on the example of Byzantine history.” In Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress of Byzantine Studies. Sofia, 2011. Vol. 3, pp. 302–303 (in Russian).

30. Kuzenkov, P., Bystrickij, N. “Current approaches towards acquisition and analysis of a Byzantine history digital data.” In Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress of Byzantine Studies. Belgrade, 22-27 August 2016. Thematic Session of Free Communications. Belgrade, 2016. Pp. 231–232 (in Russian).

Полная версия доступна только подписчикам
Подпишитесь прямо сейчас